Posted on 04/03/2010 10:51:43 AM PDT by rabscuttle385
"If you analyze it I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism." — Ronald Reagan
Nonconformist: of or characterized by behavior or views that do not conform to prevailing ideas or practices.
Recently Fox's Glenn Beck offered citizens a quiz to pinpoint where they fall in their political beliefs. The Nolan Chart (www.nolanchart.com/survey.php) provides questions which when answered honestly will place the responder somewhere on the political spectrum depicting conservative-libertarian-liberal-statist-centrist sections. Citizens who consider themselves conservative might be surprised to find they're somewhere between conservative and libertarian.
Commentators have had a difficult time labeling tea party citizens. Many are disillusioned democrats and republicans; some call themselves independents. Most have been active voters for decades. After all the emailing, letters and sending pink slips to Congress; after marching on Washington — citizen-protestors are still not taken very seriously in Washington.
Some commentators have suggested that Republican-Libertarian Rep. Ron Paul is responsible for the grassroots Tea Party movement rising up against the present Washington chaos. The truth is Paul's 2008 presidential campaign ignited long-held frustrations and also educated some of the younger generation regarding constitutional principles.
Considered a "kook" by many of his congressional peers, Paul may be the only sane one there. This is the man who just returned $100,000 of his congressional budget back to the U.S. Treasury. His congressional frugality borders on treason within free-spending Congress. Nicknamed "Dr. No" because of his thriftiness, he votes no to any legislation unless it adheres to the Constitution.
So is Paul crazy? Of course not. He's much like all citizens who are conscientiously watching their money and budgets. Regrettably there aren't enough libertarian-doers in Congress who would stop the decades of runaway-spending and cut the government down to constitutional size.
There are signs that some Libertarian-thinking citizens are running on 2010 Republican congressional tickets. These are the same people along with constitutionalists who have suffered through the frustrations of watching Washington unabashedly kill the U.S. Constitution.
One such citizen is Liberty Republican John Dennis (www.johndennis2010.com) who is running against Nancy Pelosi in San Francisco's 8th District. On congressional leaders, Dennis says:
"I think of them as far away from leadership as anything I can imagine. We are in debt ...when you add up the current debt, the unfunded liabilities, the backstops to banks, loans, all the bailouts — our quote-unquote leaders have put us all in debt to the tune of $300,000 apiece. That's not leadership. Many have the nerve to call themselves conservatives but are they really at the end of the day? — 94 percent of the house members are reelected, continually with the idea of keeping their jobs."
Reagan also said, "The federal government has taken too much tax money from the people, too much authority from the states, and too much liberty with the Constitution."
Ronald Reagan was right in his assessment of conservatism's heart. So, why do we not elect more of these sane budget-conscious thinkers to Congress? If it is conservative to hold to principles concerning budgets, reducing the National Debt, taxes and holding government to constitutional restraints, why hasn't it happened?
Most tea party citizens have long been exasperated by the federal government's "broad-constructionist" interpretation of the U.S. Constitution which has led to a distinct decline of our Republic and Civil Liberties. In case you don't know what kind of interpretation that is — think Al Gore's declaration that "the U.S. Constitution is a living document." In other words, it changes with the seasons.
The founders' constitutional intent is never taken into account by such interpretation. Otherwise, we would never have had social security, medicare, medicaid, subsidies for farmers and businesses — growing the federal government far beyond its constitutional responsibilities.
Maybe it's time that libertarian thinkers have the opportunity to turn our nation around and bring down the National Debt before bankruptcy and a real Great Depression become reality. They certainly couldn't do any worse than what we've been subjected to for the last 100 years. Let's hope it's not too late.
Given a choice, the elite Washington free-spending crowd or the nonconforming Libertarian-Republicans, citizens may just choose the ones who adhere to the U.S. Constitution over and against the careerist so-called conservative Republicans and liberal-progressive Democrats.
© Bonnie Alba
Some things never change.
Exactly. They are perennial, sullen adolescents, stuck in “gimme” mode.
Your FReeper name belies your statement.
Bush was a "compassionate conservative" and you know it.
Don't call me "son."
They’re into the blame game, but without any rational solutions. Never mind that several of us lived under total democrat control of the House for over 40 years since we were kids, and it wasn’t until 1994 that I first saw the GOP finally win the majority!
Only liberals and statists call an act of spending an "investment."
I am still consternated that the SRLC2010 (Southern Republican Leadership Conference), opening this coming Thursday, has given a speaking engagement to Ron Paul as part of the program. As you can see in the link, they talk him up as a “Republican congressman” and speak in glowing terms.
The guy isn’t even Southern!! It bothers me that Republicans allow him to call himself one of them. I have e-mailed the SRLC with no response. I suspect his people infiltrated the organizers, but I sure would like to see one or more Republican leaders speak up against the nonsense of including him.
Snotzis? lmao
My chart was the same ... it would be interesting to see the FR roster of people in a single chart...magritte
And you don't either, because your adolescent need to attack others trumps the truth every time.
That is why I have always called Paul a RINO
Ron Paul’s views are more at home with the Anti War Left
Tracing back, you butted into her conversation and now you’ve only quoted her partially and yet you felt the need to ping your friends? LOLOLOLOL.
“One thing I know for sure though, rab, son. YOU are not a Christian conservative.”
Did you look in the mirror, Bushbot?
Oh, now you have really asked for it.
I’m getting some popcorn for this one.....
I have two sons, and both of them, though not far from your age are courageous men - and you are nothing like them. And I have two daughters who make you look weak and desperate.
Calling you "son" was a far greater compliment than you deserve.
In truth, you are a name-calling, insecure child, and I didn't raise any of those. By the time my kids were 14 they could all run circles around you, intellectually and in character.
I'll never call you "son" again. You can count on that.
I don't need to defend my character nor my patriotism to you. It's you who need to defend your lack of both qualities to everyone around here who knows exactly what you're up to.
Yes, ma’am. Have a look at this post from Republican Wildcat to me: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2479203/posts?page=103#103
LOLOLOL. Bushbot. From a PAULTARD no less. *snort*
The PaulBots are like the Jehovah’s Witnesses and Scientology.
A Left Wing Anti War Cult with a perverted Cult leader
It’s this kind of infighting that just hurts our cause. I guess the Paulbots don’t care about that, though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.