Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AlanD
But I don’t think he is really good charismatic speaker or makes a great appearance on television

And Micheal Steele is? Gimme break! Steele has about as much charisma as a loaf of bread from last week. He's a turd.
Paul Ryan is a much better, far more effective speaker than Michael Steele will be if he lived to be a 1000 years. There really is simply nothing than is great about Micheal Steele. He is a terrible administrator, he is a bad policy maker, he is terrible at keeping costs down, whenever he opens his mouth he talks nonsense, he is wrong on the issues like immigration, he is confused, he is a bloody disaster!
If Paul Ryan is running the RNC’s finances, it'd be infinitely better than it is now.
Not to mention the RNC Chairs is not hired for making campaign speeches. That's what Sarah Palin is there for.
Only thing is, Pual Ryan would be wasting his talents as RNC Chairman. We need his superior financial intellect in the House, for when we take over in November.

40 posted on 04/03/2010 8:28:25 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: SmokingJoe

Paul Ryan would never be interested in being RNC Chairman. The suggestion is silly.

You need an extroverted, glad-hander who can raise the big bucks. Think Terry McCalleagh for the Democrats. We need a GOP version of him.

Job One is raise lots of money. Job Two is be a very good media communicator.


41 posted on 04/03/2010 8:32:23 AM PDT by AlanD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson