Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: greyfoxx39

So, because someone or group tolerates the expression of an opinion they or the majority of the group disagrees with, that is a tacit endorsement of the opinion? Please. In the grand scheme of things, universities are supposed to be institutions of higher learning. Just because the left seeks to ban our point of view from schools and elsewhere, doesn’t mean that we should do the same. We either believe in the Freedom of Speech and the Constitution or we don’t. To do anything else would bring us to their level.


51 posted on 04/02/2010 11:31:42 AM PDT by Reaganesque ("And thou shalt do it with all humility, trusting in me, reviling not against revilers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Reaganesque; greyfoxx39; SENTINEL
So, because someone or group tolerates the expression of an opinion they or the majority of the group disagrees with, that is a tacit endorsement of the opinion? Please.

What? Since when has Harry Reid only spoken on pro-abortion issues, and not acted?
Why have you bought into the liberal tactic that vying for the abortion industry is only something done in the mind -- as they try to frame it, a "choice"...or as you've just done, only a "vocal chord" issue of an "opinion..."..."free speech"...

I'm sorry, but when Congress passed socialized "healthcare," it wasn't simply something they expressed an opinion about. They didn't just get on their soapboxes and say, "We're going to use these to show we have constitutionally protected 'free speech.'" They acted!

And Harry Reid has not only further opened the door to govt-subsidized abortion -- thru what will be expanded by the liberals...but his voting record reveals the same thing!!!
And THAT is MUCH, MUCH more than simply what you cravenly reduced it to...
..."expression of opinion"
..."point of view"
..."freedom of speech"

(Maybe you need to go back to high school so you can discover the difference between an opinion, a point of view, a worldview, and an actual congressional vote!!! Your sickening defense of Reid calls for a new barf alert just on this post alone!!! And what's your motivation for such a defense???...for reducing his actions to editorial- page status??? Would you defend a non-Mormon politician with his track record in the same manner????)

You need to dump "Reaganesque" as your screen name 'cause this post alone highly disgraces his name!!!

Do you need a refresher on some of Reid's actual VOTES?

According to On the Issues, He Voted NO on restricting UN funding for population control policies. (Mar 2009)
* He Voted NO on defining unborn child as eligible for SCHIP. (Mar 2008)
* And he voted NO on barring HHS grants to organizations that perform abortions. (Oct 2007)

Now those are ACTION...those weren't worldview expressions only...those weren't mere opinions...those were votes that resulted/results in more dead pre-born babies!

Likewise, Reid voted against the ban on same-sex marriage in 2006. That wasn't just a moral opinion!!!

As of 2007, ontheissues.org said Reid had voted with the Democrats on 95% of his votes...and who knows, that % has likely only gone up since then!!!

63 posted on 04/02/2010 2:08:05 PM PDT by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
So, because someone or group tolerates the expression of an opinion they or the majority of the group disagrees with, that is a tacit endorsement of the opinion? Please. In the grand scheme of things, universities are supposed to be institutions of higher learning. Just because the left seeks to ban our point of view from schools and elsewhere, doesn’t mean that we should do the same. We either believe in the Freedom of Speech and the Constitution or we don’t. To do anything else would bring us to their level.

One sure has to tie themselves up in knots to defend mormon leaders approval of Reid and tacit approval of his actions.

Your comment "We either believe in the Freedom of Speech and the Constitution or we don’t is hilarious, given the mormon practice of excommunicating those whose opinion on doctrinal matters differs from the church dogma. Just ask the September Six.


70 posted on 04/03/2010 7:18:41 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (ObamaLand: Ignore the inner-city minority gangs, send the FBI after white Christian militia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Reaganesque
So, because someone or group tolerates the expression of an opinion they or the majority of the group disagrees with, that is a tacit endorsement of the opinion? Please. In the grand scheme of things, universities are supposed to be institutions of higher learning. Just because the left seeks to ban our point of view from schools and elsewhere, doesn’t mean that we should do the same. We either believe in the Freedom of Speech and the Constitution or we don’t. To do anything else would bring us to their level...

Oh, please...are Fireside chats also a forum where a diversity of opinions is sought or tolerated?

74 posted on 04/03/2010 9:30:44 AM PDT by gogeo ("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson