Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Forgotten Study: Abuse in School 100 Times Worse than by Priests
LifeSiteNews.com -- Your Life, Family, and Cutlure Outpost ^ | April 1, 2010 | By James Tillman and John Jalsevac

Posted on 04/01/2010 12:35:40 PM PDT by topher

Thursday April 1, 2010


Forgotten Study: Abuse in School 100 Times Worse than by Priests

By James Tillman and John Jalsevac

WASHINGTON, DC, April 1, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – In the last several weeks such a quantity of ink has been spilled in newspapers across the globe about the priestly sex abuse scandals, that a casual reader might be forgiven for thinking that Catholic priests are the worst and most common perpetrators of child sex abuse.

But according to Charol Shakeshaft, the researcher of a little-remembered 2004 study prepared for the U.S. Department of Education, "the physical sexual abuse of students in schools is likely more than 100 times the abuse by priests."

After effectively disappearing from the radar, Shakeshaft’s study is now being revisited by commentators seeking to restore a sense of proportion to the mainstream coverage of the Church scandal.

According to the 2004 study “the most accurate data available at this time” indicates that “nearly 9.6 percent of students are targets of educator sexual misconduct sometime during their school career.”

“Educator sexual misconduct is woefully under-studied,” writes the researcher. “We have scant data on incidence and even less on descriptions of predators and targets.  There are many questions that call for answers.“

In an article published on Monday, renowned Catholic commentator George Weigel referred to the Shakeshaft study, and observed that “The sexual and physical abuse of children and young people is a global plague” in which Catholic priests constitute only a small minority of perpetrators.

While Weigel observes that the findings of Shakeshaft’s study do nothing to mitigate the harm caused by priestly abuse, or excuse the “clericalism” and “fideism” that led bishops to ignore the problem, they do point to a gross imbalance in the level of scrutiny given to it, throwing suspicion on the motives of the news outlets that are pouring their resources into digging up decades-old dirt on the Church.

“The narrative that has been constructed is often less about the protection of the young (for whom the Catholic Church is, by empirical measure, the safest environment for young people in America today) than it is about taking the Church down," he writes. 

Weigel observes that priestly sex abuse is “a phenomenon that spiked between the mid-1960s and the mid-1980s but seems to have virtually disappeared,” and that in recent years the Church has gone to great lengths to punish and remove priestly predators and to protect children. The result of these measures is that “six credible cases of clerical sexual abuse in 2009 were reported in the U.S. bishops’ annual audit, in a Church of some 65,000,000 members.”

Despite these facts, however, “the sexual abuse story in the global media is almost entirely a Catholic story, in which the Catholic Church is portrayed as the epicenter of the sexual abuse of the young.”

Outside of the Church, Shakeshaft is not alone in highlighting the largely unaddressed, and unpublicized problem of child sex abuse in schools. Sherryll Kraizer, executive director of the Denver-based Safe Child Program, told the Colorado Gazette in 2008 that school employees commonly ignore laws meant to prevent the sexual abuse of children.

“I see it regularly,” Kraizer said. “There are laws against failing to report, but the law is almost never enforced. Almost never.”

“What typically happens is you’ll have a teacher who’s spending a little too much time in a room with one child with the door shut,” Kraizer explained. “Another teacher sees it and reports it to the principal. The principal calls the suspected teacher in and says ‘Don’t do that,’ instead of contacting child protective services.”

“Before you know it, the teacher is driving the student home. A whole series of events will unfold, known to other teachers and the principal, and nobody contacts child services before it’s out of control. You see this documented in records after it eventually ends up in court.”

In an editorial last week, The Gazette revisited the testimony of Kraizer in the context of the Church abuse scandal coverage, concluding that “the much larger crisis remains in our public schools today, where children are raped and groped every day in the United States.”

“The media and others must maintain their watchful eye on the Catholic Church and other religious institutions,” wrote The Gazette, “But it’s no less tragic when a child gets abused at school.”

In 2004, shortly after the Shakeshaft study was released, Catholic League President William Donohue, who was unavailable for an interview for this story, asked, “Where is the media in all this?”

“Isn’t it news that the number of public school students who have been abused by a school employee is more than 100 times greater than the number of minors who have been abused by priests?” he asked.

“All those reporters, columnists, talking heads, attorneys general, D.A.’s, psychologists and victims groups who were so quick on the draw to get priests have a moral obligation to pursue this issue to the max.  If they don’t, they’re a fraud.”

URL: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/apr/10040101.html


Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abuse; arth; priests; teachers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last
From the article:

But according to Charol Shakeshaft, the researcher of a little-remembered 2004 study prepared for the U.S. Department of Education, "the physical sexual abuse of students in schools is likely more than 100 times the abuse by priests."

I guess the US Department of Education under President George W. Bush must not be a reputable source of information. ( /sarcasm off )

1 posted on 04/01/2010 12:35:40 PM PDT by topher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

It’s simple: Teachers are allowed to marry and marriage causes sex abuse.


2 posted on 04/01/2010 12:39:25 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher
Also from the article:
Weigel observes that priestly sex abuse is “a phenomenon that spiked between the mid-1960s and the mid-1980s but seems to have virtually disappeared,” and that in recent years the Church has gone to great lengths to punish and remove priestly predators and to protect children. The result of these measures is that “six credible cases of clerical sexual abuse in 2009 were reported in the U.S. bishops’ annual audit, in a Church of some 65,000,000 members.”

6 priests out of the 65 million member church. It should be stated that there are not 65 million priests.

But I would be a lot more concerned about the children in our schools.

Or perhaps paperboys and papergirls for the New York Times might be in more danger...

3 posted on 04/01/2010 12:39:32 PM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

VEEERRRYY INTERESTING!!!!!!!!

Selective use of information must be one of Alinsky’s guidelines.


4 posted on 04/01/2010 12:40:07 PM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

But they aren’t afraid of the public schools so it could be 1000 times more. It is only the Church and especially the Catholic Church that stands in their way.


5 posted on 04/01/2010 12:40:30 PM PDT by tiki (True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Kids have to be safer in Catholic schools than in public schools, that’s a no brainer.


6 posted on 04/01/2010 12:40:43 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher
Priests don’t have a union.
7 posted on 04/01/2010 12:41:09 PM PDT by throwback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

It’s not forgotten, it’s just ignored by the MSM. They want to fracture and destroy organized religion. I believe Catholics are public enemy #1 because they haven’t rolled over on a lot of the social issues yet.


8 posted on 04/01/2010 12:43:03 PM PDT by xenob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

He who deflects is the loser.

Loser.


9 posted on 04/01/2010 12:43:06 PM PDT by arealconservativeforachange (Tell JD Hayworth to run for McCain's seat! http://www.jdhayworth.com/contact.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Abuse is bad wherever it is, and needs to be rooted out (perpetrators and any who cover for them alike) wherever it occurs.


10 posted on 04/01/2010 12:47:10 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Kids in Catholic schools also run a 200% greater risk of being educated.


11 posted on 04/01/2010 12:51:09 PM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ( FIRE STUPAK: LindaForCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

I thought I clicked on
A “Guilty/Not Guilty” thread...
Sorry... My mistake...


12 posted on 04/01/2010 12:52:07 PM PDT by Haiku Guy (Gov. Chris Christie (R) won the NJ-6 held by Rep. Frank Pallone (D) by a 15.5% margin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Do the schools cover it up and transfer the teachers to new schools without telling anyone at the new school about the pedophilia?


13 posted on 04/01/2010 12:53:35 PM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB
Kids in Catholic schools also run a 200% greater risk of being educated.

My daughter came home from school yesterday complaining that they tried to teach them stuff on a half-day before vacation. I told her that I hope she resisted. She said, "Way ahead of you, Dad!"

14 posted on 04/01/2010 12:54:23 PM PDT by Haiku Guy (Gov. Chris Christie (R) won the NJ-6 held by Rep. Frank Pallone (D) by a 15.5% margin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: topher

It’s simple, the Catholic church is unapologetically pro-life, therefore, they are an enemy of the state and of Obamacare.

The teacher’s unions are reliable Democratic supporters, so don’t expect to see any serious evaluation of abuse in schools....until of course, a Republican is back in the White House, or the abuse occurs in a charter school, or home school, in which case the MSM will be all over it.


15 posted on 04/01/2010 12:57:38 PM PDT by Sir Clancelot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Incidents are under reported because of the decentralized character of the public schools. There are some 10,000 independent school districts in the United States with no central clearing house for personnel, not even in the state education agencies. Furthermore, in most cases, the parents are children are more concerned to see the perp disappear from their child’s life than to punish him/her. The demand is that they get fired, not prosecuted. More often than not, the accusation is false or unprovable, or in any case. hard to prosecute. So the police are just as happy to see the perp leave their jurisdiction. or at least this was the case until the priest crisis. Now we have gone the other way and a perp is likely to be tarred for life even for a relatively minor offense. Still there is no mechanism that keeps a teacher from losing a job in North Carolina and ending up with a job in Oregon. The losing district is unlikely to tell the receiving district about the cause of his
dismissal for fear of suit, however unlikely that maybe. We are after all, talking about a population of three million teachers and a very big country.


16 posted on 04/01/2010 12:58:03 PM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

It’s commonly called “Pass the Trash”.

http://www.oregonlive.com/special/index.ssf/2008/02/schools_cut_secret_deals_with.html


17 posted on 04/01/2010 1:02:11 PM PDT by WOBBLY BOB ( FIRE STUPAK: LindaForCongress.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: babble-on

They “cover up” in this way. The new district phone the personnel office in the old district and asks about him. Even if the new district asks about abuse, the old districts files have been purged unless criminal charges have been brought.
so the clerk will share with the new district only what is in the file, which is normally little except his basic employment records.


18 posted on 04/01/2010 1:03:31 PM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB

You have it.


19 posted on 04/01/2010 1:04:13 PM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: topher
You would think by all the media accounts that the only people who abuse children are Catholic priests and Scout leaders.

My son's kindergarten teacher, who was neither a priest nor a scout leader, was fired under seemingly unknown circumstances, but with rumors of some sort of indiscretion. Six months later, he called me. I thought, to have a casual conversation. He was a great teacher and my son really liked him. Towards the end of the conversation, he asked if he could take my son fishing. Immediately, a red flag went up and I artfully dodged the request. He called back a few months later with the same request. This time I was a little more emphatic and he never called back.

It gives me the creeps thinking about what may have happened to my son.

20 posted on 04/01/2010 1:05:14 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson