“When one enters the country illegally they are not following the rules. If one doesn’t follow the rules they need to get out.
That is one the most likely explanation of what she meant, given that she also said, “No, I’m not for amnesty” and given that she said “Illegal aliens are called illegal for a reason”. “
“That is one the most likely explanation of what she mean”
No, it is not likely at all, in fact it is preposterous.
That the most likely explanation of what she meant, given that she also said, “No, I’m not for amnesty” and “Illegal aliens are called illegal for a reason”.
No, it is not likely at all, in fact it is preposterous.
Okay sure.
Somebody who is against "amnesty" has to be for "amnesty".
Somebody who claims that one who enters the country illegally is not following the rules, has to be claiming the opposite.
Somebody who claims that one who doesn’t follow the rules needs to get out, has to be suggesting that the rule breakers should stay.
Got it.