[rabscuttle385]

Are all Ron Paul's supporters as dishonest and divisive as you?

I posted Sarah Palin's direct words, with a verifiable and credible source.

Are you suggesting that they are "dishonest and divisive"?

[Lakeshark]

Actually you underlined a part of it and forgot what she said about securing the borders.

That's dishonest and typical of you.

It's also dishonest as Hell to ignore the many, many statements she has against illegal immigration.

It's a willful distortion of what she claims to stand for, and typical of Ron Paul's juvenile followers.

[SoConPubbie]

I posted Sarah Palin's direct words, with a verifiable and credible source.

Are you suggesting that they are "dishonest and divisive"?

You are being rather selective Rabs.

Let's widen the search pattern to the last several months and look at the pattern of your posting. Any reasonable person would look at your Guilt by Association tactics, at least, and come up with the same "dishonest and divisive" tag.

[stephenjohnbanker]

You post verifiable facts and verbatim quotes. All you get back is derision. Got the picture?

[mkjessup]

Are all Ron Paul's supporters as dishonest and divisive as you?
I posted Sarah Palin's direct words, with a verifiable and credible source.
Are you suggesting that they are "dishonest and divisive"?

A question Lakeshark: what does Rab's views regarding Ron Paul (pro or con) have to do with the statements from Sarah Palin, direct quotes?

If I post a quote from George Herbert Walker Bush about the 'New World Order', nobody says "Mark, you dirtbag, you're just a Reaganite, that's why you don't like GHWB!"

The fact is, it DOES NOT MATTER if a poster supports, or leans to one candidate or another, if they make a post that is accurate, if the quotes they include are true, if the sources are verifiable, it should make no difference who they personally support.