Posted on 03/29/2010 9:21:46 AM PDT by kristinn
Fox News just ran a short story announcing a man was arrested for threatening to kill Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA)and his family. If I heard correctly, the threat was made in a YouTube video.
Nothing on the wires yet...
Oh my gosh, that’s Big Ben Rothlesburgher!!!!!
You-tube will pull that one shortly.
GOOD find!!!
DEFINITELY SAVE that, someone!!!!!!!!
I won’t hold my breath for the apologies from the LIARS who said Cantor wasn’t telling the truth.
Yes, that’s one I saved!!!
http://jammiewearingfool.blogspot.com/2010/03/philadelphia-man-charged-with.html
Barack Obama Donor.
Funny how there hasn’t been a single arrest resulting from any of the alleged acts of violence against Democrats of late but here we have a real incident resulting in an arrest.
Here’s a video from a Norman LeBoon. If this is him he’s seemingly a Muslim and a real nutcase.
Norman LeBoon Sr. is indeed a Shia Muslim that the good USA has it’s locks on!Allah knows ALLLove for ALL,
More here.
I wonder how reticent the media will be to label him a Muslim considering how quick they are to label these militia wackos as Christians.
LeBoon just so happens to be a Barack Obama donor. Somehow I doubt that’ll be part of any headlines.
Yes - that’s the first one I saved from my post # 43.
He looks like he has a gunshot in that vid. Hmmmmmm.
Good. They will start pulling them very soon.
Oh that excellent, roses of Sharon!!
The video I saved is embedded. All is safe now.
Kristinn, your thread is a gem. No, make that GOLD!
Leboon, Norman Sr
Philadelphia, PA 19149
OBAMA, BARACK (D) President
OBAMA FOR AMERICA
$255 primary 06/20/08
Get this one too:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f24_1249435666
He is threatening evangelical christians and warning the media not to write anything bad thing about muslims. Maybe that’s why the media never writes anything bad about Muslims....lol. Some girl walks by in the background. She obviously knows what the nut is up to. hmmmm......
bttt
Profile: Norman LeBoon
Norman LeBoon was a participant or observer in the following events:
May 12, 2006: Telecoms Sued over Allegedly Illegal Cooperation with NSAs Domestic Spying Program Two public interest lawyers sue Verizon Communications for $5 billion, claiming the telecommunications firm violated privacy laws by giving the phone records of its customers to the NSA for that agencys secret, warrantless domestic surveillance program. Lawyers Bruce Afran and Carl Mayer are asking that Verizon stop turning over its records to the NSA without either a court order or the consent of the customer. Afran says of the NSA program, This is the largest and most vast intrusion of civil liberties weve ever seen in the United States. [CBS News, 5/12/2006] Days later, AT&T and BellSouth are added to the lawsuit. [CNN, 5/17/2006]
Verizon Helped Build an NSA Database? - The day before, the press reports that the NSA has built a database of millions of domestic phone records since shortly after the 9/11 attacks, using records from Verizon, BellSouth, and AT&T (see May 11, 2006). Former Qwest CEO Joe Nacchio, whose firm refused to cooperate with the NSA, says that he was approached months before the attacks to help set up such a program (see February 27, 2001). The NSA has the power, under President Bushs interpretation of his wartime authority, to have the agency eavesdrop on international calls made to or from the US, but cannot legally eavesdrop on internal calls unless it has a court order. The lawsuit claims that the telecoms violated the Constitution and the Telecommunications Act by giving its records to the government without court authorization. The lawsuit seeks $1,000 for each violation of the Telecommunications Act, or $5 billion if the case is certified as a class-action suit. The lawyers are seeking documents detailing the origins of the NSA program, as well as Bushs own role in authorizing the program. Federal law prohibits the phone companies from giving records to the government without a warrant, says Afran. There was no warrant, nor was there any attempt to get warrants, which is in violation of the constitution and the Telecommunications Act. [CBS News, 5/12/2006; CNET News, 5/15/2006]
Afran says, One of the purposes of this case is to, quite frankly, hold the threat of financial destruction over the heads of the phone companies to make them abandon this policy of cooperating with warrantless searches by the government. [National Public Radio, 5/17/2006]
The lawsuit alleges that Verizon constructed a dedicated fiber optic line from New Jersey to a large military base in Quantico, Virginia, that allowed government officials to gain access to all communications flowing through the carriers operations center. A former consultant who worked on internal security will later say he had tried numerous times to install safeguards on the line to prevent hacking on the system, as he was doing for other lines at the operations center, but he was prevented from doing so by a senior security official.
One of the allegations against Verizon in the lawsuit is made by Philadelphia resident Norman LeBoon, who says after he read of the alleged surveillance of US citizens, he began asking Verizon if his landline communications were being shared. LeBoon says he eventually spoke with Ellen in Verizon customer service, who told him, I can tell you, Mr. LeBoon, that your records have been shared with the government, but thats between you and me. They [Verizon] are going to deny it because of national security. The government is denying it and we have to deny it, too. Around here we are saying that Verizon has plausible deniability. [Truthdig, 8/9/2007]
AT&T Grants Unlimited Access? - The lawsuit claims that in February 2001, days before Qwest was approached, NSA officials met with AT&T officials to discuss replicating an AT&t network center to give the agency access to all the global phone and e-mail traffic that ran through it (see February 2001).
Earlier Reporting Made Key Error - Earlier reporting of the NSAs cooperation with the telecoms got a key detail wrong, says telecom analyst Scott Cleland: What I think people got wrong with the original reporting, was that this was local phone companies tracking local phone calls. What is clear now is they were tracking long distance calls. [National Public Radio, 5/17/2006]
LOL!
WOW! What a crackpot.
LOL. Just another Obama supporter.
This guy is an Obama Donor.
http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail.php?st=PA&last=Leboon&first=Norman
Nothing on Drudge.
I hope Breitbart is first.
And don't hold your breath, either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.