I agree. When reading the indictment, it seemed real touchy-feely to me....real short on actual crimes committed.
The crimes are of the "by-interpretation" variety. No instance of any hurt person or damaged property whatsoever
The MSM won't let the facts get in their way.
I started to compose a comment in the same vein. The indictment is short on descriptive observation. I could tell from the Libby indictment that the government had a good case, because the indictment recited specific evidence (to be proven, sure, but a summary of the evidence was provided.)
There are no quotes of what was said by the defendants. Not ONE quote.
I may fish up other indictments that ring of conspiracy, for comparison. Meanwhile, these guys are going to get bail denied, and likely 18 months or more of incarceration before a trial. Heck, that 16 year old kid who made hoax bomb threats has been held w/o bail for about a year (and 900 miles from home!), no trial yet.