Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Raycpa
I would not support virtually everything he signed or stands for.

And neither would the Supreme Court, once it's established Obama has committed fraud. That's the point. We don't have to prove whether or not he's a natural born citizen, we already have proof that he has been party to fraud in order to be seen as eligible. It's only a matter of time till the full story comes out.

40 posted on 03/28/2010 11:24:27 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

You are delusional. The SC has no authority over whether a president is duly elected. As I stated, that is the House and the House already ruled. No SC (except perhaps a liberal one overstepping its boundaries) would entertain the issue.

If you are proposing we have a SC overreach its authority and act outside of the constitution, then no I fully disagree with you and would not support such a move by our courts. We would lose any remaining respect for our constitution and all bets would be off.


43 posted on 03/28/2010 11:34:33 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson