Because you were saying the BC was a waste of time and because you don’t think Obama’s policies could be reversed. If you knew he was a fraud, would you support him and assume his policies should remain in effect??
Your logic is that if we prove Obama is a fraud anything he signed into law to date would be null and void?
I’m afraid that is delusional.
We have a process for admitting presidents and a process for removing them. There is no special “OMG we elected a fraud” process in our constitution.
You falsely said that raycpa supported Obama without any evidence to support your statement.
His opinion that the BC isn’t an option for follow up is an opinion with which we may disagree but I’m getting real tired of freepers accusing others of all kinds of things without any more evidence than a disagreement.
He didn’t say anything that remotely suggests support for Obama and your accusation is off base.