To: RS
Still the same. The big holdup has been that the prosecution wanted the outtakes from Wuterich’s 60 minute interview. They were convinced they contained some form of an admission of guilt or confession and it may have even been in a nonverbal form. CBS told them to kick rocks. Been dragging this deballcle out far too long. In the meantime, the judge in the Chessani case ruled an appearance of UCI. Pretty much ended that case. Probably and yea verily the same exists for this case.
I think they should drop it.
A little Pandorum now and then is a good thing. ;-)
57 posted on
03/27/2010 9:45:16 PM PDT by
bigheadfred
(BE WHO YOU ARE. SAY WHAT YOU FEEL. Those who matter don't mind.Those who mind don't matter)
To: bigheadfred
Didn't follow any of the UCI stuff, and it dosent really interest me.
If it does go to trial I hope all the conflicting statements can get sorted out - that's what really bugged me about this.
Those outtakes would have been very interesting - I'm kind of torn on if they should be protected - don't see why we should only have access to the edited version. Gives the media too much power.
58 posted on
03/27/2010 10:51:15 PM PDT by
RS
("I took the drugs because I liked them and I found excuses to take them, so I'm not weaseling.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson