Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: firebrand
There has to be a substitute Republican bill. Vastly simplified over this 2700-page wonder that no one understands. So repeal should wait until 2011, repeal and replace. The platform for the November elections should include the simplified bill. MHO, anyway.

You're a no good Rino! By adding "replace," we're conceding that health care reform is necessary! A true conservative would simply campaign on repeal! Any attempt to make health insurance more accessible is socialism.

/unhinged, anti-intellectual knee-jerk Freeper mode

99 posted on 03/25/2010 2:16:16 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: curiosity
I think out each issue by itself. On some I disagree with the FR consensus.

I don't think we can continue with the present system or lack thereof. Although I am in favor of capitalism and free enterprise in general, I wonder if a profit-making industry should be in charge of our health care. Their profit necessarily comes out of our care.

The Dems have tried to please everybody but have ended up with a confusing and I think unworkable pastiche. Besides, they are amoral and will use age or pre-born-ness to determine whether someone gets care, or life--an essentially unethical foundation. We can't leave things the way they are. Health care has gotten expensive enough to bankrupt people, and the insurance as constructed by the insurance industry is not working. They are in business to deny as much health care as possible.

I think the ideas of simplify and make totally ethical are a winning combination for Republicans.

100 posted on 03/25/2010 2:48:06 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson