Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


Obama's attack 'out of proportion,' Israeli polls say administration's reaction harmed peace process

[Dr. Aaron Lerner - IMRA:
Other results from the same Ma'agar Mohot poll:
Do you support Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's decision to continue
construction in Jerusalem ?
Yes, 62% No 26%

Do you think that Prime Minister Netanyahu's decision will lead to more or
less pressure from the United States ?
More 61%, less 9%, same 21%

Do you think that President Obama is:
pro-Arab 42%, pro-Israel 9% or neutral 34%

Some claim that if Israel were to withdraw to the '67 lines - including
leave the Golan - it would enjoy peace for generations since the Arabs would
no longer have any claims against Israel. Do you think that this is a naive
or simplistic view or a reasonable and correct assessment?
Naive and simplistic 82% Reasonable and correct 8%

Does the decision of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to continue
construction in Jerusalem prove that he has a backbone?
Yes 55%, No 22% ]

Obama's attack 'out of proportion,' Israeli polls say
By GIL HOFFMAN The Jerusalem Post 19/03/2010 06:08
www.jpost.com/Israel/Article.aspx?id=171336

Majority of Israelis also feel administration's reaction harmed peace
process.

Three-quarters of Israelis believe that US President Barack Obama's
administration's attack on Israel for building in Jerusalem was
disproportionate, according to two polls released Thursday.

The polls were taken after a week of headlines about outrage from top Obama
administration officials about a low-level Interior Ministry planning
committee announcing plans to build 1,600 housing units in Jerusalem's Ramat
Shlomo neighborhood during the visit of US Vice President Joe Biden.

A Ma'agar Mohot poll of 511 respondents, representing a statistical sample
of the population, found that 75 percent of Israelis who expressed an
opinion believed the Obama administration had overreacted, while 25% said it
had not blown the issue out of proportion.

The poll, which has a margin of error of 4.5%, was sponsored by Dr. Aaron
Lerner's Independent Media Review Analysis organization.

A separate poll of 483 Israelis taken by Shvakim Panorama for Israel Radio
found that 74% of Israelis believed the Obama administration had exaggerated
in its response, while 17% believed its behavior was justified. The rest did
not know or did not express an opinion. That poll also had a 4.5% margin of
error.

The Ma'agar Mohot poll also asked whether the American administration's
criticism of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's government helped or harmed
the peace process. Among those who gave an opinion, 63% said it harmed the
peace process, 31% said it would have no impact, and just six percent said
it would help.

The numbers were more stark among voters on the Left side of the political
map. The view that Obama had harmed chances for peace was shared by 82% of
Labor voters and 70% of people who voted Kadima.

When asked whether they were satisfied with the Obama administration's
efforts to prevent Iran's nuclearization, 67% of respondents said yes, 9%
said no, and 24% said it was so-so. Only 1% of Israelis described themselves
as "very satisfied" with Obama's handling of the Iranian situation.


3 posted on 03/22/2010 4:56:11 PM PDT by SJackson (Barack Obama went to Harvard and became an educated fool. Rep. Bobby Rush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson

a similar poll last year found that W as seen as pro-Israel by 88-2. So, from 88-2 to 9-42. Thte number of those who say Obama is pro-Israel has dropped by only a mere 90% and the of those who say he’s pro-Arab has risen by only a mere 2100%. From +86 to -33, a 119 pt swing.

Not too shabby.


4 posted on 03/22/2010 5:13:34 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson