Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AlanD
who is very Pro-Life.

I am not that familiar with his entire history but I can state that if he falls for this E.O. move - he is NOT Pro-Life. This is a useless move that can be (and probably will be) reversed with another E.O.

I will wait to see how he votes before commenting further but I am *not* liking how he's talking....

69 posted on 03/21/2010 7:09:40 AM PDT by Momto2 ("A sharp tongue is the only edge tool that grows keener with constant use" Irving - Rip Van Winkle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Momto2

It’s also an EO that will never be written. The Bamster’s promises are void as soon as they come out of his mouth. This is political cover for Stupak, nothing more.

The Rats know this is unpopular, so they are looking to protect as many other Rats as possible. Stupak is being called in because they need him.

Chet Edwards, for example, has been given permission to vote against it, cause he’s in a big fight in a relatively conservative area of Texas.


80 posted on 03/21/2010 7:15:19 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson