Skip to comments.
Health Bill Will Fail Without Stupak Democrats
IBD's Capital Hill ^
| 3/20/2010
| Ed Carson
Posted on 03/20/2010 6:50:49 PM PDT by Slyscribe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: tbw2
Sure, he could. But then the next POTUS could reverse it. That’s assuming he doesn’t *deem* himself The Kenyan King of America for life.
21
posted on
03/20/2010 9:48:00 PM PDT
by
azishot
(J.D. Hayworth...U.S. Senator FOR Arizona...http://www.jdforsenate.com/)
To: Tulane
And there is about at least 10 undecideds leaning toward no.
22
posted on
03/21/2010 2:45:10 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
("Ked Tennedy would have been plowed... I mean, proud today..." - Senator Max Baucus (Drunk-MT))
To: tbw2
KEEP PUNCHING THOSE NUMBERS! WE AIN’T GOT TIME TO ORGANIZE A PROTEST!
23
posted on
03/21/2010 2:46:09 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
("Ked Tennedy would have been plowed... I mean, proud today..." - Senator Max Baucus (Drunk-MT))
To: vortigern
Stupak wants this bill. He will fold like a cheap house of cards.Course he wants this bill. On the basis of the single-payer option being in the bill. This pro-life stance of his is foolish nonsense, its a political cover.
24
posted on
03/21/2010 2:48:23 AM PDT
by
BigSkyFreeper
("Ked Tennedy would have been plowed... I mean, proud today..." - Senator Max Baucus (Drunk-MT))
To: Man50D
Any federal version of health care is unconstitutional since Article 1 Section 8 does not grant Congress the power to regulate health care. These people ignore the Constitution when it suits them and they hold it up in reverence when it suits them. I have ZERO (no pun intended) faith that the SCOTUS will uphold anything regarding Article 1, Section 8 as it pertains to this health control boondoggle. See the Kelo decision for one example and there are many, many more.
25
posted on
03/21/2010 5:29:01 AM PDT
by
Thermalseeker
(Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
To: Thermalseeker
These people ignore the Constitution when it suits them and they hold it up in reverence when it suits them. I have ZERO (no pun intended) faith that the SCOTUS will uphold anything regarding Article 1, Section 8 as it pertains to this health control boondoggle. See the Kelo decision for one example and there are many, many more.
I agree. It is precisely the reason why it is incumbent upon the people to uphold the Constitution.
26
posted on
03/21/2010 5:33:04 AM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it! www.FairTaxNation.com)
To: azishot
Do you think the Supreme Court would overturn it?
27
posted on
03/21/2010 7:34:56 AM PDT
by
tbw2
(Freeper sci-fi - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
To: tbw2
My guess would be they wouldn’t even hear the case. I’m in a bad mood today so I can’t be responsible for my thoughts.
28
posted on
03/21/2010 7:44:01 AM PDT
by
azishot
(J.D. Hayworth...U.S. Senator FOR Arizona...http://www.jdforsenate.com/)
To: azishot
That’s one reason why I was reluctant to call congress-critters - I didn’t think I could be civil.
29
posted on
03/21/2010 11:00:06 AM PDT
by
tbw2
(Freeper sci-fi - "Humanity's Edge" - on amazon.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson