>A Constitutionalist Democrat? Show me one GD (forgive me Lord) one, just one f’kng Democrat that cares what the Constitution says or feels bound by it.
You miss the point. You are assuming that ‘Republican’ implies ‘Constitutionalist.’ McCain is, of course, a counter-example which invalidates the ENTIRE implication. {’Implication’ in the Logic-sense.}
>As for Ron Paul he’s a broken clock politician, he’s been right twice. Audit the fed and maybe making pot legal
Ok, how’s this? We needed a Constitutional Amendment to criminalize, nationally, alcohol... why then is Marijuana [or any other substance] nationally illegal? Why is there an agency with national jurisdiction on Alcohol [the aforementioned amendment WAS repealed], Tobacco [which has NEVER had a Constitutional amendment regarding it], or Firearms [which has a Constitutional amendment PROHIBITING the Government restriction thereof]?
> - if half the moonbats who worked to get Obama elected sat home smoking pot, they’d never been able to stuff the ballot boxes or make it to the voting booth - the pizza industry would be thriving though.
>
>That’s Dope and Change I can believe in....
So, is your gripe against Democrats-specifically, or against government ‘leaders’ who ignore or selectively-enforce the Constitution? That is to ask, would you vote for someone [sat 3rd party] who you knew was a Constitutionalist before major-party candidates whom you knew to NOT be Constitutionalists?
the reason we have the atf is because of mobsters like al capone