Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: onyx
If it’s all on the up and up, why not put it in the bill’s language?

I am so confused. Earlier today the Pro Choice group threatened to walk if the Stupak amendment was incorporated. Then we hear that they might live with the EO which makes one scratch their head wondering precisely what was contained in the EO. Bambi is apparently speaking out of both sides of his mouth trying to appease both sides with a wink and a nod. It makes no sense.

1,444 posted on 03/20/2010 9:27:03 PM PDT by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1426 | View Replies ]


To: StarFan

Goes back to the old adage that says,

when you set out to please everyone, you end up pleasing no one.

The liar-in-chiefcan;t be believed, yet some idiots choose to “selectively” believe him.

Again, Stupek must know, he’s not fooling God.


1,446 posted on 03/20/2010 9:29:50 PM PDT by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1444 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson