Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DietCoke
Ellsworth decided to vote YES “for the children

That 'for the children' line always gets me. But it's okay for Mr. Ellsworth to vote for the bill that kills babies with federal $. I guess those children don't count.

127 posted on 03/20/2010 7:55:59 AM PDT by Dinah Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: Dinah Lord

That is exactly what I am so confused about. Why do things for the children and this whole thing stems on the right to murder them before they have the opportunity to even be born. Pretty soon, there won’t be any children left to do things for.


132 posted on 03/20/2010 7:57:26 AM PDT by Shire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

To: Dinah Lord

He said that wasn’t in the bill... I said that hasn’t been decided!!! Grrrrr...


170 posted on 03/20/2010 8:07:35 AM PDT by DietCoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

To: Dinah Lord

And what about the children of those families who currently have good, employer-provided health care WHO WILL CERTAINLY LOSE THAT GOOD COVERAGE when the government option is mandated?

Because some children don’t have insurance, is it good to ruin it for other children?

Sadly, in their communist minds, it is. That is exactly what they mean by “justice.”


215 posted on 03/20/2010 8:19:03 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson