NO. I am making the argument that you are a troll. Maybe a paid deem-ocrat shill, I don't know, but a troll none the less.
Forcing people to buy insurance is forcing them to buy a service. And that it is against the U.S. Constitution. Now I know you deem-ocrats don't think much of our Constitution, other then wanting to use it as toilet paper to wipe your oversize loads with. But still, it is only by the rule of law that this country, any country can stand. With out the rule of law you have nothing but tyranny.
I also remember the worst president in the history of this country. And I remember how life was with carters high tax's and liberal socialist policies.
I remember all the business's closed up and stood like empty shells in our small town leaving only the gas stations and bars open. Our once happy little town was like a ghost town, empty of people on the streets because no one had any money to go anywhere, do anything.
And I remember going hungry. Giving what I had to my kids, but still they cried hungry because we didn't have more to eat. I remember spending one whole winter with no heat. I remember both my ex husband and I working full time jobs and still we couldn't afford coffee, sugar, or meat, except for chicken backs and necks. I even burned coil oil lamps to cut down on our electricity bills.
And I know what this health care bill is going to do to this country with all the tax's they added, I lived that tax hell once already under the liberal carter. And I don't want to go there ever again!
Is there going to be any logical progression of data points or actual facts to go with your trashing of my name or is emotion all you have to offer in the arguments.
And regarding your other post “what little bit you’ve done since 2004”... Are you being malicious, obtuse or both? Have you seen the full history, length, depth and inquisitiveness of my posts? It’s not like I have posted 9 or 10 little one liners since 2004.
Dig deeper, go back more than one or two pages of my history, read and try to understand my lines of logic in these and you will see how silly you sound. I have over 500 posts most of which are hundreds and hundreds of words and multiple paragraphs in length debating very nuanced and complex topics.
Just because I think the likes of Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin are bad for the Republican party and people like Newt Gingrich and the writings of David Frum, the policies of Richard Nixon and the theses of William Buckley are good for the Republican party does not make me a democrat troll.
We either keep the tent open or the party splits and we lose it all. Scott Brown is a case in point. A RINO who will vote against the party platform perhaps 50% of the time? Yes. Better than a Ted Kennedy successor, ABSOLUTELY!
You, it seems, are looking to diminish the square footage of the tent and that is bad for both the party and the country.