To: metmom; wmfights; P-Marlowe; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; shibumi; Quix; xzins; MHGinTN; valkyry1
Likewise, [scientific explanation is not the] only possible explanation for the cause of an event You are right. The science says diseases are caused by microorganisms, and the Bible says they are caused by "demons." Now, if you have pneumonia, which of these "possibe" explanations will you bet your life on?
551 posted on
03/27/2010 11:42:22 PM PDT by
kosta50
(The world is the way it is even if YOU don't understand it)
To: kosta50
Your question in post #551 assumes that these explanations are mutually exclusive.
552 posted on
03/28/2010 12:39:19 AM PDT by
shibumi
("..... then we will fight in the shade." (Cool Star - *))
To: kosta50
Just out of curiosity, what is your political philosohy? Did you vote for Obama?
559 posted on
03/28/2010 5:37:57 AM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: kosta50; wmfights; P-Marlowe; betty boop; Alamo-Girl; shibumi; Quix; xzins; MHGinTN; valkyry1; ...
You are right. The science says diseases are caused by microorganisms, and the Bible says they are caused by "demons." Now, if you have pneumonia, which of these "possibe" explanations will you bet your life on? The Bible doesn't state that ALL diseases or conditions are a result of demonic activity, so you're working from a flawed set of presumptions.
Medical science can do OK with certain situations. But if you don't have something that can be easily fixed by surgery or Lipitor, or insulin, medical science is useless.
Doctors are NOT interested in really helping people and getting to the root of what is causing your problems, especially if you have some problem that doesn't fit into one of their nice, neat little diagnosis compartments.
564 posted on
03/28/2010 10:50:20 AM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson