So what? It doesn't mean we ARE apes. Looks can be deceiving and science has yet to demonstrate beyond the shadow of a doubt the link between man and the rest of the bipedal mammals. They haven't found it yet, in spite of their efforts and repeated attempts at fraud.
If you want to think of yourself as an animal, then that's your prerogative. If you believe that God created man in His image, then you must believe that God is a monkey.
And who worships the lessor or inferior God?
Not me. The God I worship isn't a liar. I don't think He lied in the Genesis account of how He created man, and it was not through evolution, but from the dust of the earth in a separate act of creation.
What fact helps you to explain WHY we are more similar to a chimp and a chimp is more similar to us, than either is to a gorilla?
Looks are not what this is based upon, but a rigorous examination and comparison of DNA sequences. But yes, morphologically we “look” like a species of ape, and for non-deceptive reasons.
The link between man and bipedal apes is well established, and the thousands of autralopithocene and Homo fossils are not fraudulent, despite your repeated fraudulent efforts to characterize them as such.
Biologically we are animals. Spiritually we are made in the image of God.
If you think God looks like a hairless bipedal ape, than yes, God would look like us. We look exactly like a hairless bipedal ape.
A monkey is not an ape. How ignorant you must be to confuse the two terms.