Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream; valkyry1
Who discovered that Piltdown man was a fraud? Scientists did.

Who perpetrated the Piltdown Man fraud? Oh yeah, it was scientists.

Who discovered that the Chinese half bird was a fraud? Oh yeah, it was scientists again.

WHo perpetrated archaeoraptor? Oh yeah, it was scientists again.

Unlike science, creationists embrace their frauds and charlatans.

But not all creationists.

Creationists would not have discovered that the frauds were frauds because no scientist would allow a creationist to actually examine said fossil to begin with. For one thing, they are working under the presumption and delusion that creationists are incapable of doing the science involved to make that determination. The other would be that then someone just might discover that it really was a fraud and blow their cover, instead of it taking 40 years to have it happen.

Dinosaur tracks besides those of modern men.

And I'll raise you an archaeoraptor....

Creationists just LOVE those little lies.

Scientists just love their big lies.

Face it. There isn't a thing you can throw up in creationist's faces that can't be equally applied to scientists.

108 posted on 03/23/2010 2:31:26 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: metmom
Sure, Science produces things of value. Creationists produce nothing of value.

Industry values science education and pays people if they know and understand science and can produce things of value.

Industry has no use for creationists. They produce nothing of value.

112 posted on 03/23/2010 3:02:36 PM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson