Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush responds: 'This is ball game' (asks audience to call the Capitol)
Politico.com ^ | 03/16/10 | Michael Calderone

Posted on 03/16/2010 1:16:08 PM PDT by OldDeckHand

Just now, Rush Limbaugh responded to a couple of my email questions on air about why he's now urging listeners to call Congress over health care legislation.

It's an unusual move for Limbaugh, who as Erick Erickson tweeted, has only done so once before. Despite having the largest talk radio audience in the country, Limbaugh typically doesn't use his show to mobilize listeners for coordinated political action.

The last time Limbaugh gave out the Capitol's switchboard number on air, he said, was when Steve Roberts was writing a profile of him in the 1990's for U.S. News & World Report. Limbaugh said that Roberts "was of the belief -- like so many people believed back then -- that all I was doing was giving out phone numbers of members of Congress and switchboards in Washington."

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhohealthcare; healthcare; limbaugh; obamacare; rush; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
Rush said to Calderone...

""This is ball game. This is ball game, and Michael, the only reason we're at this point is because the American people have stood up. The Republicans don't have the votes to stop this. And the Martians don't have the votes to stop this. Republicans may as well be Martians on this given their influence. All we can do is continue to have the American people let it be known they want no part of this -- the substance of the bill or the process. They don't like it. And that's why I am urging -- because this is a transformation of our country into something that no one has ever seen it be like. And we don't want that transformation to take place. We like America as it was founded. We don't want to turn it into a third world country."

1 posted on 03/16/2010 1:16:08 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

I don’t see it as ball game. Just more of the same. Why wasn’t social security ball game? Or medicare? This is just tacking on runs.


2 posted on 03/16/2010 1:17:12 PM PDT by Huck (Q: How can you tell a party is in the majority? A: They're complaining about the fillibuster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand; qam1
Ronald Reagan speaks from beyond the grave to denounce Socialized Medicine:

Back in 1927 an American socialist, Norman Thomas, six times candidate for president on the Socialist Party ticket, said the American people would never vote for socialism. But he said under the name of liberalism the American people will adopt every fragment of the socialist program.

There are many ways in which our government has invaded the precincts of private citizens, method of earning a living; our government is in business to the extent of owning more than 19,000 businesses covering 47 different lines of activity. This amounts to a fifth of the total industrial capacity of the United States.

But at the moment I would like to talk about another way because this threat is with us, and at the moment, is more imminent.

One of the traditional methods of imposing statism or socialism on a people has been by way of medicine.

It’s very easy to disguise a medical program as a humanitarian project, most people are a little reluctant to oppose anything that suggests medical care for people who possibly can’t afford it.

Now, the American people, if you put it to them about socialized medicine and gave them a chance to choose, would unhesitatingly vote against it. We had an example of this. Under the Truman administration it was proposed that we have a compulsory health insurance program for all people in the United States, and, of course, the American people unhesitatingly rejected this.

So with the American people on record as not wanting socialized medicine, Congressman Ferrand introduced the Ferrand bill. This was the idea that all people of Social Security age, should be brought under a program of compulsory health insurance. Now this would not only be our senior citizens, this would be the dependents and those that are disabled, this would be young people if they are dependents of someone eligible for social security.

Now , Congressman Ferrand, brought the program out on that idea out , on just for that particular group of people. But Congressman Ferrand was subscribing to this foot-in-the door philosophy, because he said, “If we can only break through and get our foot inside the door, then we can expand the program after that.

Walter Ruther said, “It’s no secret that the United Automobile Workers is officially on record of backing a program of national health insurance. And by national health insurance, he meant socialized medicine for every American.

Well, let us see what the socialists themselves have to say about it. They say once the Ferrand bill is passed this nation will be provided with a mechanism for socialized medicine capable of indefinite expansion in every direction until it includes the entire population. Now we can’t say we haven’t been warned.

Now Congressman Ferrand is no longer a Congressman of the United States government. He has been replaced, not in his particular assignment, but in his backing of such a bill by Congressman King of California. It is presented in the idea of a great emergency that millions of our senior citizens are unable to provide needed medical care. But this ignores that fact that in the last decade, 127 million of our citizens, in just 10 years, have come under the protection of some form of privately owned medical or hospital insurance.

Now the advocates of this bill when you try to oppose it challenge you on an emotional basis. They say, "What would you do? Throw these poor people out to die with no medical attention?”

That’s ridiculous and of course no one is advocating it. As a matter of fact, in the last session of Congress a bill was adopted known as the Kerr/Mills bill. Now without even allowing this bill to be tried to see if it works, they have introduced this King bill, which is really the Ferrand bill.

What is the Kerr/Mills bill? It is a frank recognition of the medical need or problem of the senior citizens I have mentioned and it has provided from the federal government, money to the states and the local communities that can be used at the discretion of the state to help those people who need it.

Now what reason could the other people have for backing a bill which says we insist on compulsory health insurance for senior citizens on a basis of age alone regardless of whether they are worth millions of dollars, whether they have an income, whether they are protected by their own insurance, whether they have savings.

I think we can be excused for believing that as ex-congressman Ferrand said, this was simply an excuse to bring about what they wanted all the time -- socialized medicine.

James Madison in 1788 speaking to the Virginia convention said, “Since the general civilization of mankind, I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.”

They want to attach this bill to Social Security and they say here is a great insurance program; now instituted, now working.

Let’s take a look at Social Security itself. Again, very few of us disagree with the original premise that there should be some form of savings that would keep destitution from following unemployment by reason of death, disability or old age. And to this end, Social Security was adopted, but it was never intended to supplant private savings, private insurance, pension programs of unions and industries.

Now in our country under our free-enterprise system we have seen medicine reach the greatest heights that it has in any country in the world. Today, the relationship between patient and doctor in this country is something to be envied any place. The privacy, the care that is given to a person, the right to chose a doctor, the right to go from one doctor to the other.

But let’s also look from the other side. The freedom the doctor uses. A doctor would be reluctant to say this. Well, like you, I am only a patient, so I can say it in his behalf. The doctor begins to lose freedoms, it’s like telling a lie. One leads to another. First you decide the doctor can have so many patients. They are equally divided among the various doctors by the government, but then the doctors are equally divided geographically, so a doctor decides he wants to practice in one town and the government has to say to him he can’t live in that town, they already have enough doctors. You have to go some place else. And from here it is only a short step to dictating where he will go.

This is a freedom that I wonder if any of us has a right to take from any human being. I know how I’d feel if you my fellow citizens, decided that to be an actor I had to be a government employee and work in a national theater. Take it into your own occupation or that of your husband. All of us can see what happens once you establish the precedent that the government can determine a man’s working place and his working methods, determine his employment. From here it's a short step to all the rest of socialism, to determining his pay and pretty soon your son won’t decide when he’s in school where he will go or what he will do for a living. He will wait for the government to tell him where he will go to work and what he will do.

In this country of ours, took place the greatest revolution that has ever taken place in the world’s history; the only true revolution. Every other revolution simply exchanged one set of rulers for another. But here, for the first time in all the thousands of years of man’s relations to man, a little group of men, the founding fathers, for the first time, established the idea that you and I had within ourselves the God given right and ability to determine our own destiny. This freedom was built into our government with safeguards. We talk democracy today, and strangely, we let democracy begin to assume the aspect of majority rule is all that is needed. The “majority rule” is a fine aspect of democracy provided there are guarantees written in to our government concerning the rights of the individual and of the minorities.

What can we do about this? Well, you and I can do a great deal. We can write to our congressmen and to our senators. We can say right now that we want no further encroachment on these individual liberties and freedoms. And at the moment, the key issue is, we do not want socialized medicine.

In Washington today, 40 thousand letters, less than 100 per congressman are evidence of a trend in public thinking.

Representative Hallock of Indiana has said, “When the American people wants something from Congress, regardless of its political complexion, if they make their wants known, Congress does what the people want."

So write, and if this man writes back to you and tells you that he too is for free enterprise, that we have these great services and so forth, that must be performed by government, don’t let him get away with it.

Show that you have not been convinced. Write a letter right back and tell him that you believe government economy and fiscal responsibility, that you know governments don’t tax to get the money they need; governments will always find a need for the money they get and that you demand the continuation of our free enterprise system.

You and I can do this. The only way we can do it is by writing to our congressmen even we believe that he's on our side to begin with. Write to strengthen his hand. Give him the ability to stand before his colleagues in Congress and say that he has heard from my constituents and this is what they want. Write those letters now call your friends and them to write.

If you don’t, this program I promise you, will pass just as surely as the sun will come up tomorrow and behind it will come other federal programs that will invade every area of freedom as we have known it in this country until one day as Normal Thomas said we will wake to find that we have socialism, and if you don’t do this and I don’t do this, one of these days we are going to spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children, what it once was like in America when men were free.


3 posted on 03/16/2010 1:18:59 PM PDT by a fool in paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Why wasn’t social security ball game? Or medicare?

Rush wasn't on the air when they were passed.

4 posted on 03/16/2010 1:19:03 PM PDT by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Huck
"I don’t see it as ball game. Just more of the same. Why wasn’t social security ball game? Or medicare? This is just tacking on runs."

I agree with you to a point. But, if you look at Europe, and especially the Scandinavian countries, it is the nose at the end of socialized medicine that has allowed the state to peak under the tents of their citizens in the most direct and intrusive way.

This of course, says nothing with the inherent problems of allowing the gubmit to be in charge of 1/6th of the nation's economy. The acceleration in the growth of the "nanny state", will be exponential, if this passes.

Lastly, it will create a larger, and more robust dependency on government, beyond what is even realized with Social Security and Medicare.

5 posted on 03/16/2010 1:22:19 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
Capital Hill Switchboard where a human answers:

877-762-8762

I just called..... it's busy.

6 posted on 03/16/2010 1:25:06 PM PDT by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

They are already setting us up for rationed care with the raising of ages to screen for colon, prostate, and breast cancers.

And talking about the over use of technologies like mri scans.

One reason why doctors may have been “over cautious” was because of trial lawyers (and there is no tort reform in this bill).

We were always told that the tactic to beating cancer was early detection. Now that’s changed. And yet this White House still tries to say that they support preventative care.


7 posted on 03/16/2010 1:26:25 PM PDT by a fool in paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Huck
I don’t see it as ball game.

I do.

Why wasn’t social security ball game? Or medicare?”

Both are bankrupt This is why they are both going to have to be seriously reformed, or they take the country down with them.

8 posted on 03/16/2010 1:27:42 PM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

“Rush wasn’t on the air when they were passed.”

LOL but probably very true in this instance and in these days and times.


9 posted on 03/16/2010 1:28:05 PM PDT by El Gran Salseron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

BTTT for later perusal.


10 posted on 03/16/2010 1:28:20 PM PDT by Positive (Nothing is sadder than to see a beautiful theory murdered by a gang of brutal facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

Plus, they were actually passed legitimately.


11 posted on 03/16/2010 1:28:23 PM PDT by Carling (I'm a neo-McCarthyite ... Obama is a Communist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
It's an unusual move for Limbaugh, who as Erick Erickson tweeted, has only done so once before.

Because this is what Rush knows happens:

Heard it on Fox: Rush caused congress phone lines to be overloaded (Tuesday, March 16, 2010 2:18:54)

12 posted on 03/16/2010 1:28:32 PM PDT by a fool in paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Does anyone know if the Capitol switchboard has cooled down yet?


13 posted on 03/16/2010 1:31:20 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Cavuto keeps trying and he’s not getting through...


14 posted on 03/16/2010 1:36:54 PM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Guy on Cavuto is saying they were in the offices and lines were off the hook.


15 posted on 03/16/2010 1:37:56 PM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Nice post. Thank you.


16 posted on 03/16/2010 1:38:02 PM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Irenic

That’s akin to what happened in Louisiana awhile back. Landrieu’s office could call out but calls weren’t coming in...


17 posted on 03/16/2010 1:39:58 PM PDT by a fool in paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand; All

He needs to give the fax numbers also as all the fax numbers I have dialed have been open. You can get the fax numbers from contact pages on the congresscritters websites.


18 posted on 03/16/2010 1:41:33 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Yeah, just shows what they think of the people they *represent*...there is no longer representation, only voting in of a party ideology.

Even that’s in question with ACORN etc.

I think our country is in crisis and it’s getting WAY worse under King Chaos Obama the inept.


19 posted on 03/16/2010 1:50:05 PM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

This is the last bastion of anything like a free nonsocialist country and is the system that has supported the European ability to be squishy socialist by taking on Europe’s defense so they don’t have to pay for that. When the US of A becomes socialist prosperous socialism a la in Europe will fade into third world socialism right behind America. Our economy will no longer be propping up Europe. And China can’t continue on its path to riches either. WE ARE THE ENGINE OF THE WORLD’S ECONOMy. When we quit shoveling coal the world quits moving.


20 posted on 03/16/2010 1:51:18 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson