To: TigersEye
Number 13 would be unconstitutional I believe. It’s a de facto religious test if not an outright one.
14 posted on
03/15/2010 6:15:14 PM PDT by
Melas
To: Melas
Only if the law required it to hold office.
20 posted on
03/15/2010 6:23:34 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(It's the Marxism, stupid! ... And they call themselves Progressives.)
To: Melas
"Number 13 would be unconstitutional I believe. Its a de facto religious test if not an outright one."They don't want the record as a basis for a test on whether he was or was not baptised. They want the record to see if it confirms Obama's stated personal history.
24 posted on
03/15/2010 6:33:30 PM PDT by
DannyTN
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson