You don't have to be born in a hospital to be eligible.
If the AZ legislature passes the eligibility act that is now before them, then Obama might be in a world of sh*t ...
If passed, he would have to prove his eligibility - including NBC in order to be on the ballot in AZ. The AZ SOS might deny him, under the NBC part. Since he cannot prove it by documentation [the term NBC has not been defined], he then has three options:
He will provide the same COLB he posted online as documentation, and it will be accepted, since it says at the very bottom of the document that it is prima facie evidence of the fact of birth.
You don't have to be born in a hospital to be eligible.
Not the point, you dumb sh*t ...
I never argued he wasn't born on US soil - only that he is not NBC. He can have all of the documentation proving he was born on US soil - he has the additional NBC requirement.
He can go to court and argue that he is NBC - the government can argue he is not. But, SCOTUS will have to affirm [or deny] once and for all with the words: "Obama is [or is not] a natural born citizen".
THE POINT IS THAT THE ISSUE HAS NEVER BEEN DECIDED - NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU WISH IT TO BE TRUE UNDER ARK !!!
If the AZ legislature passes the eligibility act that is now before them, then Obama might be in a world of sh*t ...
If passed, he would have to prove his eligibility - including NBC in order to be on the ballot in AZ. The AZ SOS might deny him, under the NBC part. Since he cannot prove it by documentation [the term NBC has not been defined], he then has three options:
He will provide the same COLB he posted online as documentation, and it will be accepted, since it says at the very bottom of the document that it is prima facie evidence of the fact of birth.
It may be prima facie evidence that he was born on US soil - but it does not settle the NBC question, since his father was a natural born British subject and the laws of England claim him as a British subject also. A person born with two allegiances cannot be a natural born subject [citizen] - which was the understanding of the Founding Fathers at the time the Constitution was written.
As for prosecution - let us suppose, just suppose, he was declared NOT to be NBC.
I said he would possibly have to answer to charges. I did not say he would be convicted. I suspect that his defense would be that when he signed the documents, he was under the understanding that he WAS NBC and that it was an honest mistake. Thats reasonable - but it would cost him a fortune in attorney fees.