Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Chip

Your right of course:


At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

On the basis of the 14th Amendment, however, the majority opinion coined a new definition for “native citizen”, as anyone who was born in the U.S.A., under the jurisdiction of the United States. The Court gave a novel interpretation to jurisdiction, and thus extended citizenship to all born in the country (excepting those born of ambassadors and foreign armies etc.); but it did not extend the meaning of the term “natural born citizen.”


367 posted on 03/16/2010 9:35:16 AM PDT by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]


To: etraveler13
On the basis of the 14th Amendment, however, the majority opinion coined a new definition for “native citizen”

And notice how, in order to reach that novel definition, Gray had to rely so heavily on the Lords of British Law, while at the same time minimizing the words of the Founders of the 14th Amendment. It was a true stretch of the imagination --

377 posted on 03/16/2010 10:09:35 AM PDT by Uncle Chip (TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson