[jamese777]

If they don’t think they can take a case on standing, it doesn’t really matter what they think of the rest of the case. Several courts have made it clear that the remedy is beyond their legal jurisdiction. That doesn’t invalidate the claims.

---

It is the responsibility of those who would pursue a serious legal issue to present plaintiffs who DO have standing to sue.
While the claims are not invalidated, there is no legal remedy when a lawsuit is summarily dismissed for lack of standing.

[edge919]

It is the responsibility of those who would pursue a serious legal issue to present plaintiffs who DO have standing to sue. While the claims are not invalidated, there is no legal remedy when a lawsuit is summarily dismissed for lack of standing.

There's been no lack of trying to gain standing, but you can't make a court take a case that they think is too hot for them to take. The requested remedy is part of the consideration for standing ... of which these courts don't want to get involved. All we see is that average citizens have no recourse for challenging an ineligible POTUS.