Replies

You mean the photoshop image on the net and the newspaper adds that the grandparents called in?

No, I mean the actual newspaper microfiches that operatives for Hillary Clinton dug up during the primaries from the Honolulu public library when they were trying to be the original “birthers.”
Both newspapers then confirmed that they didn’t accept birth notices from family or friends, they only got them directly from the Bureau of Statistics.
Perhaps that’s why the topic heading in the newspaper for birth notices says “Health Bureau Statistics.”

You mean the photoshop image on the net and the newspaper adds that the grandparents called in?

It's unlikely the grandparents "called them in", since that is not the way it was done.

However they were generated by the filing of a birth certificate, even one alleging a home birth, with no doctor's signature, no hospital registrar's name and signature, and with only the signatures of an "information provider", generally a parent (but could be easily forged) and a witness, who would sign where the doctor otherwise would. IF he was not born in Hawaii, that would be the most likely source for the announcement, and would also be the source of the information on the CoLB. That is why the country needs to see the long form. A home birth in '61 for someone from Stanley Ann's background woudl be extremely unusual, but they were not real unsual in Hawaii at the time, for persons from lower socioeconomic strata. It was not yet "cool" to do a home birth.