What are all of these about, James???? Don’t you like the words of the Supreme Court on the matter??? You have been asking for them for weeks now and here they are. Take some time with them — let them soak into your consciousness. Quit running away from the truth —
What are all of these about, James???? Don’t you like the words of the Supreme Court on the matter??? You have been asking for them for weeks now and here they are. Take some time with them — let them soak into your consciousness. Quit running away from the truth —
I like the words of the U.S. Supreme Court just fine. I don’t always agree with every decision that they make, but I respect every decision that they issue as the law of the land.
There have been eight different Obama eligibility cases that have been presented for Justices’ conferences at the US Supreme Court. They are among those on the list that I posted. And that’s the truth! ;-)
(1) “Berg v. Obama et al”
(2) “Beverly v. FEC”
(3) “Craig v. US”
(4) “Donofrio v Wells”
(5) “Herbert v. Obama et al”
(6) “Lightfoot v. Bowen”
(6) “Schneller v. Cortes”
(7) “Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz”
It would probably be more effective if the current Justices of the Supreme Court (particularly the five conservatives) took some time with those words that you reference and if THEY let them “soak in,” don’t you think?
I haven’t read the legal briefs in the eight cases that have already reached the Supreme Court but I would imagine that the Justices have read those words and seen reference to those 4 cases that define “natural born citizen” in the briefs submitted by plaintiffs seeking the ouster of Obama from the White House as ineligible. Thus far, the Justices appear to not have been as moved by those words as you are.