Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/14/2010 10:10:44 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: pabianice

I’m praying the blue dogs hold firm on no.


2 posted on 03/14/2010 10:12:26 AM PDT by hstacey (An ounce of pretension is worth a pound of manure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

I’ve got a feeling we’re going to see a lot more DemocRATs accused of being homosexuals this week.


3 posted on 03/14/2010 10:12:43 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (A proud American-American since 1949.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

Looking at their count, if those numbers stay as they are, she’ll have the votes. The 35 firm/leaning ‘no’ votes would leave her with the 37 they say she needs from the “undecideds”.

Looks like the fix is in, and it’s going to take decades of work to undo this madness, if it doesn’t destroy the country as we know it first. It’s truly a shame.


7 posted on 03/14/2010 10:20:56 AM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
sadly I believe nothing from the “ The Hill “. Its a Dem party paper and the editor is a Obama drone.
8 posted on 03/14/2010 10:21:03 AM PDT by ncalburt (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

That means there are 213 no votes by The Hill count. Only need 3 more. 13 more would to be safe.


9 posted on 03/14/2010 10:21:45 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

if any dim who doesn’t vote for this AND also sits on his arse and doesn’t stop it....he/she is just as guilty as the Pelousi cabal..


13 posted on 03/14/2010 10:30:43 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
Pelosi needs 37 "yes" of 72 undecided.

Eh ??! Youre not even close. She needs 70 of 72 . Sheesh.

16 posted on 03/14/2010 10:39:18 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

The 37 in the article refers to the maximum number of defections Pelosi can afford. The article claims she is currently at 35 (giving 213 No votes). If she goes to 38 DEMS at NO, she loses. So we only need 3 more. Off the list of 72.

But I, too, do not consider The Hill to be reliable. Interesting list, unreliable.


17 posted on 03/14/2010 10:39:35 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT ("pray without ceasing" - Paul of Tarsus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
Pelosi needs 37 "yes" of 72 undecided.

That's not correct. Pelosi need 69, not 37, of 72 "undecided" members (the way The Hill is counting things). The large majority of those 72 "undecided" are really YES votes, but they haven't officially said so.

Still, it's a steep hill for Pelosi. If those 72 undecideds really were on Pelosi's side, they'd be announcing their YES votes to the media to help build momentum for passage. As it is, almost nobody is eager to support HCR, and it's almost impossible to find previous NO votes which are switching to YES. Whereas it's very easy to find previous YES votes who are either switching to NO or expressing their grave doubts.

It's not just a matter of strong-arming individual fence-sitting Democrats into voting for HCR. Even if a Congress Member is susceptible to pressure or bribes or blackmail, it's pointless for that member to give in to Pelosi if the bill is going to fail anyway. Then the member has the worst of both worlds: a career-ending vote which accomplishes nothing.

So Pelosi has to strong arm enough votes AND convince all of her caucus that she will SUCCEED in getting enough votes. That's why the White House and House Democrat leadership are putting on such a brave front that the bill will pass, and why the whole thing could so easily collapse if just a few more members announce their NO votes.

18 posted on 03/14/2010 10:41:23 AM PDT by dpwiener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

What difference will this make if they employ the Slaughter Rule?


19 posted on 03/14/2010 10:46:06 AM PDT by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
Have seen this crap before with NAFTA!

Those 72 "undecideds" have already decided. They will play this out to the last "holdout"!

Here in Ohio one of those holdout's on NAFTA was John Kasich! He kept pretending to be undecided right up to the last day. Of course he voted for it!

36 posted on 03/14/2010 11:58:24 AM PDT by FixitGuy (By their fruits shall ye know them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice
I sincerely believe that the Dems don't care about their “career's”. Somewhere they've already been paid or have the promise of being monetarily compensated for their votes.

I believe they feel this is their last chance to bankrupt this nation and will run somewhere and hide when it's all over!

37 posted on 03/14/2010 12:02:21 PM PDT by FixitGuy (By their fruits shall ye know them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

My new slogan and motto:
The founders of this country won their freedom by using guns on tyrrants. If necessary, it will keeps its freedom the same way.


40 posted on 03/14/2010 12:24:01 PM PDT by feedback doctor (The US Constituiton is a Capitalist document)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: pabianice

pubs should come out and say “well propose buying across st lines, pooling for small bus., and tort reform - so go ahead and vote NO b/c we’ll help you do those things immediately”


41 posted on 03/14/2010 12:46:41 PM PDT by Principled (Get the capital back! NRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson