PS: I’m curious. Out of all those people named in my disclaimer above who speak in the first person, what is really bothering you about person who wrote the letter to Kennedy and his employee’s reply? :) Your "disclaimer" as you call it, and as it now seems to pertain to serial misappropriations of first person quotations on your personal page, is certainly more than a day late, now isn't it.
By your own admission you manifest still more evidence of sloppy scholarship. Your original posting to this thread is just the tip of an iceberg's worth of sloppy scholarship, it seems.
What I can say is that I knew D. James Kennedy. I spoke with him in person and at length about topics related to the compromises some who call themselves Christians make with respect to the "evolutionary" world-view and the schism it has caused within the Christian church. He was a friend of my family for some 35 years until his death. Suffice it to say, when I wrote him, he replied by letter to me, not through some faithless mouthpiece by eMail.
You've chosen to reproduce an "eMail" of suspect origin and questionable pedigree from what could at best be termed an institutional "mole" -- or someone made to appear to be as one -- as though it was some sort of representative reply from Dr. Kennedy or his ministry. And you did this as if to say this was actually a meaningful "...(Response below his letter)."
Your intent is clearly to diminish Dr. Kennedy and his ministry by inference.
When I choose in the future to point Freepers to a prime example of some of the sloppiest scholarship on this board, I'll be sure to have them take note of any posting you make and send them to your personal page for more examples of the same.
Consider yourself exposed, "mole."
"...He was a friend of my family for some 35 years until his death. ... Your intent is clearly to diminish Dr. Kennedy and his ministry by inference." Ah. I figured it was "personal" (since out of all the other "first person" commentaries I have posted on my profile page, your reaction was highly emotional to only one in particular).
In re-reading the letter, I see that the Christian astrophycisist, Dr.Christopher M. Sharp, praised Dr. Kennedy's theological scholarship and his Christian ministry. He suggested that, in his personal, and professional opinion, however, that Dr. Kennedy was engaging in sloppy scholarship when it came to science.
Have you considered the possibility that you may merely be lashing out against Dr. Sharp by projecting his "sloppy (science) scholarship" conclusion onto me? :) If you have a problem with his opinion, why don't you just deal with him directly, man to man?
"When I choose in the future to point Freepers to a prime example of some of the sloppiest scholarship on this board, I'll be sure to have them take note of any posting you make and send them to your personal page for more examples of the same."
Thank you. Since I prefer to be known by those who choose to make themselves my enemies, I'm honored.
"Consider yourself exposed, "mole.""
Still "projecting", I see. Tsk, tsk. Has anyone ever suggested that you may benefit from getting some training in anger management?