Perhaps. Perhaps, not. In any event quotation marks are helpful if you are actually quoting someone, not yourself -- especially when one chooses to post a narrative written in the first person.
It's pretty obvious to me why one would prefer to distance themselves from a dismal narrative admission like that.
Your personal page contains some sloppy scholarship as well -- I refer to your letter written to Dr. D. James Kennedy, and the mis-attribution in which you chose to engage with the link labeled: "Astrophysicist writes Dr.James Kennedy. (Response below his letter)."
So, "Matchett-PI" in this example again you post your link written in the first person (are you now NOT supposed to be some presumed "Astrophysicist" named, "Chris some-one-or other"?) or in spite of all the first person narrative on this page shall we now just assume you are somebody else?
As I was saying, you labeled your link to say, "...(Response below his letter)," yet Kennedy didn't respond to you at all, now did he? Or, if in fact he did write you back, you simplistically failed to post his reply.
I don't care what academic achievement you might ever claim you had. That's just sloppy scholarship any way you slice it.
On the contrary—I EXPOSE “prophetical pap” for what it is.
You haven't exposed anything or anyone else here, but yourself and some sloppy scholarship to go along with it.
One is not surprised to see continuing sloppiness in your posting habits on this thread, as well.
Kind of sad, actually -- I'd have expected better scholarship from someone, who, to his credit, appears to know something about Calvinism and appears to have at least some passing appreciation for how its principles informed the signers of our nation's founding documents.
