Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Girlene

“Maybe a potluck dinner for a party of two is acceptable under their “land development codes”. “

As a former land developer, I can tell you that this code is illegal.


102 posted on 03/13/2010 6:44:58 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: stephenjohnbanker

Ping to post 106, giving the city’s reasons. I’d appreciate your thoughts.


108 posted on 03/13/2010 6:50:15 AM PST by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: stephenjohnbanker
===========“Maybe a potluck dinner for a party of two is acceptable under their “land development codes”. “===========

As a former land developer, I can tell you that this code is illegal.

I'm not sure if you were referring to my tongue in cheek reference to such activity or the Gilbert codes that prevent religious assembly use in a private home. If I read the actual code, the city says that "religious assembly uses" are not permitted in private homes. I believe that restriction WOULD be illegal.
127 posted on 03/13/2010 7:15:24 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson