Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Suspend environmental protection laws to reduce unemployment? (Needs a lot of help)
LA Times ^

Posted on 03/12/2010 3:04:10 PM PST by US_MilitaryRules

In response to California's stubborn 12%-plus unemployment rate, Republicans lawmakers

(Excerpt) Read more at opinion.latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhoepa; california; pollepacarb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: dynachrome

I wonder what Nazi Pelosi’s numbers look like.
Does anyone know?


21 posted on 03/12/2010 5:20:13 PM PST by Munz (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Munz

Her numbers are good in her stalinist district. That’s all she cares about. ( and gathering more power if possible)


22 posted on 03/12/2010 5:28:42 PM PST by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Munz

>> No. The state’s environmental protection laws should never be suspended. 44% (930 votes)

Extremists.


23 posted on 03/12/2010 5:35:09 PM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

Thank you

Yes. Sacramento needs to do everything in its power to cut down the state’s unemployment rate. 52% (1,161 votes)

Yes, but the 5.5% unemployment threshold for AB 32’s implementation is too low. 2% (49 votes)

No. The economy isn’t in a serious enough situation to warrant such action. 2% (54 votes)

No. The state’s environmental protection laws should never be suspended. 44% (975 votes)
Total Votes: 2,239


24 posted on 03/12/2010 5:53:20 PM PST by ricmc2175
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

I don’t care how this vote goes.

CA can sink beneath LA and MS economically for all I care.


25 posted on 03/12/2010 6:09:36 PM PST by green iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

And then there is this little gem:

“This is a completely false argument. We need green jobs and green technology to save the economy and the environment.”

I think what this implies is...they want GOVERNMENT jobs, not GREEN jobs. All paid for by STEALING from your hard earned paycheck in order to fund THEIRS.


26 posted on 03/12/2010 6:22:37 PM PST by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules; Grampa Dave; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SierraWasp; editor-surveyor; fish hawk; ...

Bump and Vote


27 posted on 03/12/2010 6:53:29 PM PST by tubebender (Tagline... I don't need no stinkin Tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

28 posted on 03/12/2010 6:58:36 PM PST by TheOldLady ("The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants." -- Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules

bump


29 posted on 03/12/2010 6:59:54 PM PST by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Sorry I forgot to ping you to my ScreenShot at #28.


30 posted on 03/12/2010 7:00:31 PM PST by TheOldLady ("The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants." -- Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: green iguana
CA can sink beneath LA and MS economically for all I care.

California is the largest economy of any state, with repercusions for all of us. Do you really want out of work Californians moving to your state and sucking up jobs?

We need a referendum like this in Oregon, to restore our once vital logging industry. Loggers have been thrown under the bus, in part because they tend to vote Republican/conservative.

31 posted on 03/13/2010 10:56:44 AM PST by ARepublicanForAllReasons (Give 'em hell, Sarah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Yes. Sacramento needs to do everything in its power to cut down the state’s unemployment rate. 50% (1,725 votes)

Yes, but the 5.5% unemployment threshold for AB 32’s implementation is too low. 3% (89 votes)

No. The economy isn’t in a serious enough situation to warrant such action. 3% (92 votes)

No. The state’s environmental protection laws should never be suspended. 44% (1,519 votes)

Total Votes: 3,425


32 posted on 03/15/2010 8:42:56 PM PDT by Ros42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson