Posted on 03/11/2010 1:10:12 PM PST by Niuhuru
Oooo A “Leading Lawyer” , I just love these “journalist” junk terms
Where are these rankings and what criteria is used to compile these standings?
Who is the Lawyer in second place and what are his/hre odds of taking the lead?
sarc/
Didn't we fight a war to rid ourselves of those people?
Why did she get involved with a Muslim in the first place?
Money??
Big red flag for me too. Another is when a TV newsreader prefaces a dig into a guest with, “Some say that....”. It’s a cowardly way to interject one’s own opinion into the discussion while pretending to remain impartial.
Historically, things rarely turn out well for members of royal families that dabble in “anti-establishment activity”.
I have always thought the royals were sort of interesting. I actually like the Queen’s Husband, but Diana was even worse than Charles and that is pretty bad.
It nauseates me to think so many here in America bought into all that Royalty crap. BooHoo, the Princess is dead.
Didn’t we fight a war to rid ourselves of those people?
How can you say such a thing - Elton John sang a song about it!!! Fart in the Wind or Wind in my fart, or something like that. It was a real touching moment.
Follow the money! Her Muslim lover sure wasn’t attractive.
Yeah. ...And it looks like we're about to have to fight another one to rid ourselves of those who believe they are "American Royalty".
Historically, things rarely turn out well for members of royal families that dabble in anti-establishment activity.
Then how do you explain Prince Charles? Surely his “dabbling” with Camilla before, after, and during his marriage to Diana is “Anti-establishment” to say nothing of his enviro-wacko pontifications,
Maybe she checked his package.
This lawyer jumped out to an early lead after the rest got stuck behind an ambulance.
“Wind in my farting tramp” (if IIRC)
>It nauseates me to think so many here in America bought into all that Royalty crap. BooHoo, the Princess is dead.
>
>Didn’t we fight a war to rid ourselves of those people?
Ah, don’t go there. Royalty is not, in itself, a bad thing; remember that Hitler’s power sprang up from a free election [at first] while Wenceslaus WAS a royal. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wenceslaus_I,_Duke_of_Bohemia
Granted, I would rather people be famous for their “good deeds” like Mother Theressa was... so popular that she stopped a battle [or, rather God used her to] with her mere presence when the attacker was not willing to assault the city because they did not want her to be collateral damage.
The Royal Family, Queen Betty, her brain-dead Prince and their mentally challenged son, as well as most of thier cousins and kin are really a bunch of low-lives themselves.
Dysfunctional Human Beings.
Now that most Christians in Britain are Catholic, maybe they can bring back the Stuarts and kick the Hanoverians out of office.
They could hardly be worse, and might be actually an improvement.
It's 2010. Sexual license and greenism are the establishment.
I think Diana was dedicated to a fantasy that would never exist. I don’t think people understood what Charles went through when he lived with Diana. Knowing what I know now about her, I think she was a lot like Marilyn in the sense that Marilyn seemed content to be a victim than someone who took control and made the best of any situation she found herself in.
I don’t think the RF wanted Diana out, but to settle in and live up to her responsibilities.
I think she did it to thumb her nose at the RF and also live a luxe life. Two birds with one stone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.