Posted on 03/11/2010 11:23:00 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan
I don’t think *uckeye and his groupies hate Orly, they love Orly. They love to lump Orly in the same pot with everyone else who questions 0bama’s eligiblity so everyone is tainted with craziness.
I’m really starting to think she works for 0bama.
They loooove Orly.
Whatever, they’re nuts, IMO!
I think you've nailed it.
“Have you ever heard of psy-ops?”
Not all that sure that I would call Orly’s Taiz’s plea to the United Nations to intervene in the US legal system or Phil Berg’s claim that George W. Bush was responsible for the Attacks of 9/11 as psy-ops.
But not the context.
In the first paragraph he talks about even Marines being intimidated. Clearly that is referring to Judge Carter, yet the thread is about action in Judge Lamberth'a court.
The poster is worried that Judge Lamberth will be intimidated, just he tells us he thinks Judge Carter, the Marine, was.
Yea, the original post wasn't very clear, but the explanation/clarification fits perfectly well with the original post. It's not just ass covering.
I was responding to the suggestion that Leo is a nutcase because he says he was being stalked.
I’m not able to see what Orly has been up to because in the past my computer got really bad viruses from going on her sites. I’m sure that means I need to check myself into a psych ward because I’m so paranoid. God knows the phenomenon of Orly’s work being sabotaged by Obots is such a piece of paranoid fiction...
Of course, my husband might not appreciate you calling it “fiction” after he spent many, many hours wiping my hard drive and re-installing everything for me.
I guess he’s just crazy too.
Regarding the idea of looking outside the country for protection, after having approached every law enforcement body I could think of (or that would allow me to report anything) in the US regarding crimes I have already documented and having NOBODY who was willing to investigate.... I tend to think it’s not so crazy to give up on American law enforcement. And that’s a very, very sad thing for me to feel I can honestly say.
For the full story on what I’ve documented and the responses I got from law enforcement, see
http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/01/11/red-flags-in-hawaii-2/
I saw the poster’s name “MinutemanCDC_SC” and the reference to MS13 and assumed the context of his comment was “this judge won’t take illegal immigration seriously until a violent Mexican gang harms his family.” But the context is not clear at all because we weren’t given a link to the comment on her web site. After thinking about it I didn’t explain my reasoning very well. Most people would rightly assume he was talking about the birth certificate issue because this was on Orly’s web site. I just figured he was probably responding to another poster who mentioned something about the judge’s stance on illegal immigration.
Buckey as usual you are displaying your true colors here on FR!!!
Linking and approving of Sarah Palin the same way???
================================================================================ Bob Barnett says:
You can't beat Oily Taste for far right comedy. She and Sarah Palin could be the new Abbott and Costello of CPAC
Bucky suffers from Orly Taitz derangement syndrome.
| Orly needs to fade away. She’s having a hard time letting go. Indeed. It seems it's the After-Birthers who can't walk away. They continue to say that this is all much ado about nothing — as they dig themselves into a deeper and deeper hole — all while TRUSTING a man they wouldn't even recognize on the sidewalk if he wasn't the president.
When you trust and support a LIAR like Obama, don't be surprised when you get sh!t upon by him while being hopelessly caught up in believing more of his LIES. |
If any of you would have taken the time to read some of the comments at the Source, you would have read that the comment that Minuteman posted at Orly's site had nothing whatsoever to do with Judge Lamberth!
Rather, it was from an Orly supporter speculating as to why one day Judge David Carter had been very favorable to Orly's case and was speaking about how eager he was to examine the evidence in the coming January, and then suddenly Judge Carter did a 180 degree turn and dismissed the case in late October.
That's all it was. Minuteman was wondering whether Judge Carter had been threatened by Obama's people, as part of his comment on Orly's blog.
Orly Taitz may have her faults -- but threatening judges is not one of them
Don't believe everything a leftist tells you.
Could you please ping your Certifigate list to my comment at Post#213 on this thread?
This is a serious slander against Orly Taitz, which apparently some Freepers are buying.
I know that there are a lot of problems that many people, even sympathetic people, have with Orly Taitz.
But this should not be one of them.
Thanks!
Dajjal
"...viscious slander against Orly Taitz on the sole basis of some leftwing blogger!
This is a serious slander against Orly Taitz, which apparently some Freepers are buying.
I know that there are a lot of problems that many people, even sympathetic people, have with Orly Taitz.
But this should not be one of them.
. . . . Check out #213, please.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2468926/posts?page=213#213
[Thanks, Dajjal.]
Bump Dat...
MinutemanCDC_SC says:
Dear O.C. Weekly readers and Patriots, Christians, Conservatives, Constitutionalists, Countrymen,
I wrote the above post as a possible explanation for an abrupt flip-flop by a Patriot, a Conservative, a Marine: U.S. District Judge David O. Carter, for the Central District of California.
From out-of-character conduct by judges, I deduce that judges are being threatened, even honorable ones, even conservative ones, and even ex-Marines.
Judge Carter, an ex-Marine, originally stated on the record that the court had jurisdiction to hear Dr. Taitz’s case, Barnett et al v Obama. He apparently was threatened when Mr. Obama placed Siddarth Velamoor, one of the attorneys working for his defense law firm, Perkins Coie, as a law clerk for the judge.
Judge Carter looked very scared, very intimidated by something at the last hearing on October the 5th. Later, he decided that the plaintiffs no longer have standing, and his court no longer has jurisdiction.
Far from inciting to violence, by sarcasm my post opposed violence, intimidation, coercion, and obstruction of justice.
My post was not calling for a criminal act by Patriots, Constitutionalists, or Marines, but decrying acts which have already caused dismissals, without any hearings on the merits, of over 100 legitimate lawsuits demanding public verification of Mr. Obama’s eligibility for office, using the original documents, one of which is the vault hard copy of his supposed Certificate of Live Birth.
My post did not encourage coercing any judge. It merely painted a most conceivable scenario of what had obviously already happened, considering the result.
The poster who quotes me here erred by ignoring the cardinal rule of interpretation:
CONTEXT, CONTEXT, CONTEXT. He also ignored the difference between “inciting” (future) and “reporting” (past).
“No Person except a natural born Citizen... shall be eligible to the Office of President;”
U.S. Constitution, Art. II, § 1, ¶ 5
http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/the-hilarious-haters/orly-taiz-approves-threats-aga/
obumpa
what a whackadoodle.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
