Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LZ_Bayonet
but his comments on the “Slaughter Solution” indicate he would go for it; says the bills could be “tie barred”.

Are you kidding? Why would he go for that because it would keep government support of abortion in!

115 posted on 03/11/2010 2:41:53 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: afraidfortherepublic
Are you kidding? Why would he go for that because it would keep government support of abortion in!

No, it would not. He is referring to "tie barring" the 2nd bill, the reconciliation bill, the one that would eliminate the funding that Stupak finds objectionable because it funds abortion.

120 posted on 03/12/2010 3:05:18 AM PST by LZ_Bayonet ( I AM THE TEA PARTY LEADER !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson