Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sharrukin

It’s a fair question and one we should research to be sure. I will do a little more digging.


46 posted on 03/08/2010 2:28:58 PM PST by mentor2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: mentor2k
This has been covered before. Said coverage was required by state law since 1981 - long before Mitt became governor. 17 other states also require coverage for low-income women. Most of the states are blue states, although Alaska and Arizona are included as well.

-In 1981, The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Ruled That The State Constitution Required Payment For Abortion Services For Medicaid-Eligible Women. (Moe v. Secretary of Admin & Finance, 1981)

- According To The Decision, When A State Subsidizes Medical Care, It Cannot Infringe On "The Exercise Of A Fundamental Right" Which The Court Interpreted As Access To Medically Necessary Abortion Services. (Moe v. Secretary of Admin & Finance, 1981)

- In 1997, The Supreme Judicial Court Reaffirmed Its Position That A State-Subsidized Plan Must Offer "Medically Necessary Abortions." (Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Attorney General, 1997)

17 states provide low-income women access to abortion: AK, AZ, CA, CT, HI, IL, MD, MA, MN, MT, NJ, NM, NY, OR, VT, WA, WV. http://www.naral.org/choice-action-center/in_your_state/who-decides/fast-facts/low-income-women.html

47 posted on 03/08/2010 3:00:11 PM PST by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson