Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Right Winged American

I’m looking at the UCAV role beyond fifth generation. I guess, in the mean time, we’ll need to go to war with what we have until we have what we need.


32 posted on 03/08/2010 10:20:16 AM PST by RC one (WHAT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: RC one

I understand; but another thing to consider is the current airframe lacks a vertical stabilizer, severely limiting high-g ACM.

I’d have to say that for the fleet CAP role, they’re going to have to start with a clean sheet of paper. That implies anywhere from 7 to 15 years development before it’s ready.

For the Marines, I have to say I like the idea of someone like Grumman taking the Fairchild A-10 and reworking it for Short-Deck carriers. If we had to, I think this is more do-able than going for the UCAV’s.

Besides, the only thing UCAV’s are is a re-useable SLAM, which will take longer to develop, and cost WAY more. Why not build more Tomahawks?


39 posted on 03/12/2010 9:01:15 AM PST by Right Winged American (No matter how Cynical I get, I just can't keep up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson