1 posted on
03/05/2010 7:53:01 PM PST by
Track9
To: Track9; STARWISE; onyx; maggief; Liz; SE Mom
Looks like were going to be playing another round of “Where in the world is Algee hiding”!
Guess he’s embarrassed to show his face in public.
2 posted on
03/05/2010 8:00:36 PM PST by
hoosiermama
(ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
To: Track9
More from the article.
"Ehrlich wrote The Population Bomb, which also included this interesting advice for governments of the future: that they should put “temporary sterilants” in the water supply and then closely regulate the antidote in order to choose who could reproduce and when. If he’s the leading light of AGW theory, that explains (a) why it’s not science-based at all but rather a screen for statist control, and (b) why it’s collapsing as a science."
3 posted on
03/05/2010 8:03:22 PM PST by
Track9
(Oh never mind)
To: Track9
Yes, it’s important to gut the credibility of skeptics as opposed to producing good data and good science to do that.
4 posted on
03/05/2010 8:03:56 PM PST by
Brett66
(Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: Track9
I hope these idiots never discover “snail mail”. LOL!
5 posted on
03/05/2010 8:06:32 PM PST by
doc1019
(To call Obama a bumbling idiot would be an insult to bumbling idiots worldwide.)
To: Track9; Fractal Trader; tubebender; marvlus; Genesis defender; markomalley; Carlucci; ...
7 posted on
03/05/2010 8:10:40 PM PST by
steelyourfaith
(Warmists as "traffic light" apocalyptics: "Greens too yellow to admit they're really Reds."-Monckton)
To: Track9
At least these charlatans are smart enough to wait until the snow melts first.
8 posted on
03/05/2010 8:11:34 PM PST by
pnh102
(Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
To: prairiebreeze
9 posted on
03/05/2010 8:31:07 PM PST by
prairiebreeze
(Prayers for the Ft. Hood families, victims and soldiers.)
To: Track9
"In private e-mails obtained by The Washington Times, climate scientists at the National Academy of Sciences say they are tired of “being treated like political pawns” and need to fight back in kind." Oh, they're so tired of being treated like "political pawns" but they have no compunction about recommending onerous, oppressive taxes and austerity policies on the American public and the rest of the world.
10 posted on
03/05/2010 8:32:43 PM PST by
StormEye
To: Track9
...to challenge critics by running a back-page ad in the New York Times Brilliant strategy.
To: Track9
To: Track9
I think the FBI needs to get busy investigating the piggies at the Nat’l Academy of “Sciences”. I understand them wanting to save their scam to keep the grants rolling in but this fiasco is over. It’s time for these so-called “scientists” to move on and maybe look for a real job.
15 posted on
03/05/2010 9:52:50 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(If you liked 2009, you're going to LOVE 2010!!!!!)
To: Track9
” challenge critics by running a back-page ad in the New York Times.”
How trendy and useful. Maybe the bozos can tack up pro-abortion posters at planned parenthood, too.
To: Track9
“an outlandishly aggressively partisan approach”The emails and cooked up IPCC report show this has always been an outlandishly aggressive partisan approach
18 posted on
03/06/2010 8:58:45 AM PST by
SteamShovel
(When hope trumps reality, there is no hope at all.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
