Exactly. The Donofrio suit representing a slew of Chrysler dealers (and all Republicans I seem to recall)who were put out of business by GM when it was taken over, and who then sued. This suit attached a notice pointing to the fact that Obummer couldn’t take over ownership of GM unless and until he proved eligibility for his office(and iffy even then) is supposed to go back to court yet again this coming Monday, Mar 8, I believe. This may be a move to attempt to make this case moot, as was done when that National Guard Officer who was being activated for service in Iraq, questioned the legitimacy of Obummer’s presidency and they just cancelled his orders and released him from service (after getting on the phone and getting his boss to fire him if the boss wanted to keep his government contracts, which he did). What a corrupt administration!!!
Chrysler dealerships were not put out of business by General Motors. GM and Chrysler are two separate companies with two separate bankruptcies.
This suit attached a notice pointing to the fact that Obummer couldn't take over ownership of GM unless and until he proved eligibility for his office ...
No. The appeal by the Chrysler dealers claimed that the dealership closings were not required to close the sale to Fiat. The quo warranto petition that Donofrio and Pidgeon are considering, which is wholly separate from the bankruptcy appeal, will be based on the misuse of TARP funds by an illegitimate adminstration.