To: pburgh01
Stupak is a liberal, but he is 100% pro-life. Just because no one that is pro-abortion could correctly be deemed a conservative does not mean that liberals can’t be pro-life.
17 posted on
03/05/2010 3:22:58 PM PST by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
To: AuH2ORepublican
Stupak is a liberal, but he is 100% pro-life. Just because no one that is pro-abortion could correctly be deemed a conservative does not mean that liberals can’t be pro-life. All that's germane in this discussion are his pro-life bona fides. He has voted pro-life in the past; we're hoping he's as good as his word this time.
The FReepers who are shocked, shocked to discover he's actually voted with Democrats on other issues should remember that he's, well, a Democrat.
21 posted on
03/06/2010 4:53:41 AM PST by
rhema
("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
To: AuH2ORepublican
We’ll see, my bet is that he is a useless hypocrite.
22 posted on
03/06/2010 5:14:02 AM PST by
pburgh01
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson