> What universe do the wackos live in?
Indeed.
So, just to sum up your belief structure, Parsy ...
As we first established:
Do you trust Barack Hussein Obama? *no*
Do you trust Obama’S 2008 Chicago campaign office? *no*
Do you trust FactCheck’s Tweedle Dumb & Tweedle Dumber? *no*
Do you trust Pelosi & the Democratic National Committee? *no*
Do you trust the chain of evidence on Obama’s COLB? *no*
We have further established:
Did the Hawaii newspapers confirm they ran Obama’s birth announcements? *no*
Is Fukino is qualified to make a determination on Obama’s NBC Eligibility? *no*
Did Fukino confirm her office sent the COLB to Obama’s Campaign staff? *no*
BUT ... you "believe"?
... are you really, REALLY sure you didn't vote for him?!
For the LAST time.
Your argument:
I don’t trust Obama, so therefore the COLB is false. Because whenever you don’t trust somebody, all their documents are obviously false and forgeries.
My argument:
I don’t trust Obama, but the COLB looks real. And there were the birth announcements.
YOU engage in circular reasoning. I don’t trust Obama so his COLB is false. His COLB is false so I don’t trust him. Since I don’t trust him...
So drop it. If you want to “dis-believe” go for it. Spend your spare time analyzing every noun and verb in HDOH press releases. Scour the world for any old book you can find from 1789 backwards that says what you want it to say. Ignore all the ones that don’t. Go tell an American court that WONG is wrong, and they were just flat wrong for using English common law to determine intent. Tell other birthers the same thing, too, if you want.
And tell the American court what those other birthers told the Indiana Court. Remember from last week?:
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/11120903.ebb.pdf
The Birther’s Argument (based on Vattel and the usual speeches from whoever they find):
Contrary to the thinking of most people on the subject, there’s a very clear distinction between a ‘citizen of the United States’ and a ‘natural born citizen.’(page 12)
The Court’s Smackdown of the Birthers’ :
Based upon the language of Art. II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “Natural Born Citizens” for Art. II, section 1. purposes, regardless of the citizenship of the parents.” (Page 17)
If you want to ignore that, than by all means be my guest. It is, after all, one whole sentence. But someday when you are sitting there with egg on your face, remember Old Parsy, and how you had a choice..
parsy, the noble and long suffering