Was that a YES or a NO to my question??? or just another one of your dissembling dodges???
Well, I'm sorry you couldn't figure it out from my post about the #2 part of this issue...
The #2 part is the natural born status of a candidate... and I was saying that you are not going to know.
That's because it's going to take the Supreme Court to finally decide the issue. All you're going to get is one bunch of lawyers saying it's "this" (one side of the natural born status) -- as the State of Hawaii did.
And then you're going to get another set of lawyers saying "that" (the other side of the natural born status) -- as you and some others are saying.
Bottom line, you'll never know for sure (what the "law of the land" is on this issue), until the Supreme Court decides it.
You can "assert" your position on it, but you're not going to "know" what is the final answer.
So then we birthers are doing the right thing for everybody's assurance by pressing this issue into every court venue all the way up to the Supreme Court. Isn't that right???
Oh and BTW -- the Constitution, which includes Article II, is "the highest law of the land" -- not a Supreme Court decision.