Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye

So what? That’s a non-sequitur in this context.


I oould have sworn that the ultimate context was Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution. Where’s the non-sequitor?


59 posted on 02/28/2010 2:18:42 PM PST by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: jamese777

The “ultimate context?” I don’t do mind reading or seances. The context was in my post and the article I was responding to.


60 posted on 02/28/2010 3:05:22 PM PST by TigersEye (It's the Marxism, stupid! ... And they call themselves Progressives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson