Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ARepublicanForAllReasons
The problems with this will be high sulfur coal as a pollutant.

The process has been known from the turn of the century and used widely in countries that didn't have access to oil.It is an energy intensive process, so that was where the cost was. I though maybe they should make it with solar furnaces in Arizona or somewhere like that. If you do some "googling", you can even find a place that will sell you a unit to make it yourself if you have access to coal. The one I saw before would fit on an 18 wheeler and could be hauled anywhere.

31 posted on 02/24/2010 10:15:21 PM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: chuckles

The lignite found in Texas tends to be relatively low in sulfur.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/coal_trans/chap2.html
See Table 2, West-South Region


41 posted on 02/25/2010 5:48:11 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson