But by your very comments you indicate you don’t understand King. I explain this in my other post to you. As soon as you say x racial achievements MUST be noticed not because the achievement itself demands recognition, but because it was accomplished by a particular race, you demean both the race and the achievement. “Well, such and such was invented by a black man.” Oh, really? So, the invention of such and such wasn’t significant enough to be elevated on its own? Again, that is the very definition of racism.
As soon as you say x racial achievements MUST be noticed not because the achievement itself demands recognition
When did I say that?