[hinckley buzzard]

Debates resolve nothing. Science does not rely on debates. It relies on empirical methods broadly agreed upon, mutuality and integrity among investigators.

Besides: The warmist con-artists have been eager to lie to the world on paper. Why should we expect them to be honest in a debate? Makes no sense.

The participants would probably have fun though.

[neverdem]

Debates resolve nothing. Science does not rely on debates.

This isn't just science anymore. It's politics and politicized science. All the young skulls full of mush have only heard the crap from the left. When they understand the fraud behind this crap they can begin to question all the other BS they have been taught in public schools like Howard Zinn's A People's History Of The United States. These kids need a lot of deprogramming when two thirds of those under 30 years old voted for Obama.

[justa-hairyape]

Why should we expect them to be honest in a debate? Makes no sense.

And they wont. They will use tricks, stunts and cons. For example, Bill Nye the Science Guy used a trick with his recent debate with JB. He put a black ink pigment into water to visually trick the viewer into thinking the concentration was greater then it really was. They are not our peers. They never were. Their elitist pedigree means nothing.