I’d address your accusation if I believed there was any merit to it. What exactly are you alleging I’m doing here ? I’ve stated that this candidate is dangerous to our national security. I believe he is willfully misrepresenting himself and misleading others as to what exactly he truly stands for. I accuse him of being the liar in that regard, and I do not trust him.
He claims at one point to not be like his father, and it simply doesn’t pass the smell test. When you have a candidate who is considered to directly inherit the mantle of his father’s ideology, who benefits from his father’s fundraising network, and has the same cadre of cult-like followers working and shilling for them, to claim they’re NOT carrying on as such is completely bullcrap. I say the old adage, “Where there’s smoke...” applies here.
I think we covered this. Look at your post 40 and then look at my post 114.