OK. So you sound self accountable. Maybe you know a few more people who are, but what about all the others?
Take the issue of abortion. Before they become "socially acceptable" very few were ever performed. Now, millions are dead each year. What about the homosexual agenda? How many are dying of AIDs today who wouldn't be if it weren't sold as "a normal behavior" in the public schools?" Very few teens became mothers in the past, but once it became socially acceptable, the number became virtually unlimited.
Abortion....infringes upon the right of a beating heart...not a moral issue, but a civil right issue. Killing infringes upon civil rights, period
Homosexual....why are we pouring billions of dollars into curing AIDS, when it is a direct result of personal behavior? Two fags that choose to have unprotected sex do not infringe upon each others rights. The results of this transgression should not infringe upon my rights (by confiscating my wages as taxes to pay for this research for a 99.999% preventable disease is a direct violation of my rights)
Teen pregnancy are a direct result of the sexual revolution, in other words, the damn hippies of the ‘60’s with their communist agenda. Teaching sex or sexual orientation in the schools violates my right to raise my family as I see fit. This is a case of the federal government regulating morality. Their moral values are in direct conflict with mine. This violates my right to raise my family as I see fit.
In conclusion, regulation of morals is a slippery slope, one that has ALWAYS lead to tyranny.
Enforcing ones rights is a different situation, and is a must for a society to remain viable.